What's the worst that could happen?

cross-posted from: https://pawb.social/post/28223553

OpenAI launched ChatGPT Agent on Thursday, its latest effort in the industry-wide pursuit to turn AI into a profitable enterprise—not just one that eats investors’ billions. In its announcement blog, OpenAI says its Agent “can now do work for you using its own computer,” but CEO Sam Altman warns that the rollout presents unpredictable risks.

[…]

OpenAI research lead Lisa Fulford told Wired that she used Agent to order “a lot of cupcakes,” which took the tool about an hour, because she was very specific about the cupcakes.

  • foggy@lemmy.worldEnglish
    411·
    19 hours ago

    Not for negative numbers floating point … Just read the list man, no they were not. You’re incorrect here.

    They were faster. Not more accurate.

    Just like AI.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nlEnglish
      132·
      18 hours ago

      Just to be clear, you’re saying that ENIAC was just as prone to mathematical error as a guy doing long division on paper would have been?

      • foggy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        35·
        11 hours ago

        Stop building straw men.

        I never claimed ENIAC was as error prone as a human; I cited its specific technical limits to refute your oversimplification.

        You’re dodging my actual point by moving the goalposts. My whole point has been pretty clearly stated that today’s complaints about AI’s inefficiency sound exactly like the old complaints about the first computers.

        If you’re going to keep employing logical fallacies and move goalposts to make an argument with me and waste my time, I’m just going to block you.