• Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Microsoft: I know this will only be used for evil, but I’ll be damned if I’m gonna pass up on the hype-boost to my market share.

      Every other big corp: same!

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    8 months ago

    “At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus”

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Like what even is a legitimate use case for these? It just seems tailor made for either misinformation or pointless memes, neither of which seem like a good sales pitch

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Say you’re a movie studio director making the next big movie with some big name celebs. Filming is in progress, and one of the actor dies in the most on brand way possible. Everyone decides that the film must be finished to honor the actor’s legacy, but how can you film someone who is dead? This technology would enable you to create footage the VFX team can use to lay over top of stand-in actor’s face and provide a better experience for your audience.

        I’m sure there are other uses, but this one pops to mind as a very legitimate use case that could’ve benefited from the technology.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          how can you film someone who is dead?

          Hot take: don’t? They’re dead, leave them dead. Rewrite and reshoot if you really have to.

          • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sure that’s an entirely valid option; but not the one the producing team and the deceased’s family opted for… and they had a much larger say in it than you and I combined.

        • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          We’ve already recreated dead actors or older actors whole cloth with VFX. Plus it still seems like a niche use case for something that can be done by VFX artists that can also do way more

          • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Having done something before doesn’t mean they shouldn’t find ways to make it better though. The “deepfake”-esque techniques can provide much better quality replicas. Not to mention, as resolution demand increases, it would be harder to leverage older assets and techniques to meet the new demands.

            Another similar area is what LLM is doing to/for developers. We already have developers, why do we need AI to code? Well, they can help with synthesizing simpler code and freeing up devs to focus on more complicated problems. They can also democratize the ability to develop solutions to non-developers, just like how the deepfake solutions could democratize content creation for non/less-skilled VFX specialists, helping the industry create better content for everyone.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              They can also democratize the ability to develop solutions to non-developers,

              This is insane. If you don’t understand everything a piece of code is doing, publishing it is insanely reckless. You absolutely must know how to code to publish acceptable software.

              • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Try telling that to businesses. Sadly, you’d more likely to be laughed all the way to the door as opposed to being taken seriously. For the non technical people leading businesses, they’d rather something working 90% of the time today than 100% of the time next week.

        • ramirezmike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          this is so dystopian. Imagine spending your career honing your skill as an actor, dying and then having a computer replace you with just a photograph as a source. How is that honoring an actor??

          An actual, practical example is generating video for VR chats like Apple has somewhat tried to do with their headset. Rather than using the cameras/sensors to generate and animate a 3d model based on you, it could do something more like this, albeit 2d.

        • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Gotta crank up that dystopia meter.

          This is slowly moving toward having Content On Demand. Imagine being able to prompt your content app for a movie/series you want to watch, and it just makes it and streams it to you.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe a historical biopic in the style of photos of the time. Like take pictures of Lincoln, Grant, Lee, etc., use voice actors plus modern reenactors for background characters, and build it into a whole movie.

        I dunno, I’m probably reaching.

      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think you’re falling for the overblown fearmongering headline, and pointless memes is a great reason to make things.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Vasa? Like, the Swedish ship that sank 10 minutes after it was launched? Who named that project?

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Combine this with an LLM with speech-to-text input and we could create a talking paintings like in harry potter movies. Heck, hang it on a door and hook it with smart lock to recreate the dorm doors in harry potter and see if people can trick it to open the door.

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    These vids are just off enough that I think doing a bunch of mushrooms and watching them would be a deeply haunting experience

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    A long time ago, someone from a not free country wrote a white paper on why we should care about privacy, because written words can be edited to level false accusations (charges) with false evidence. This chills me to the bone.

    • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is turning into some Mistborn shit. “Don’t trust writing not written on metal”

    • Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      “You shot that man, citizen. Here is video evidence. Put your hands against the wall.” - and more coming to you soon!

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d be less-concerned about the impact on not-free countries than free countries. Dictator Bob doesn’t need evidence to have the justice system get rid of you, because he controls the justice system.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is why I don’t post my picture online and I never talk to anyone ever, while hiding my head inside a nylon stocking (unrelated).

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Freddie, this is your mom. Look all I want for my birthday is for you to please start using teams new. It’s so much better than teams classic. I alread… Microsoft already installed it for you. Okay honey? And could you also start using a microsoft.com account so you can get financially hooked like all the Gmail users? It’s pretty smart. Don’t you want to be smart like Jonny? Tata!

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, I know it’s scary, but I’ll admit it is impressive, even when I watched it with jaded “every day is another AI breakthrough” exhaustion.

    The subtle face movements, eyebrow expression, everything seems to correctly infer how the face would articulate those specific words. When you think of how many decades something like this would be in the uncanny valley even with a team of trained people hand -tweaking the image and video, and this is doing it better in nearly every way, automatically, with just an image? Insane.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s pretty wild that this is the tech being produced by the trillion dollar company who has already been granted a patent on creating digital resurrections of dead people from the data they left behind.

      So we now already have LLMs that could take what you said and say new things that seem like what you would have said, take a voice sample of you and create new voice synthesis of that text where it sounds a lot like you were actually saying it, and can take a photo of you and make a video where you legit look like you are saying that voice sample with facial expressions and all.

      And this could be done for anyone who has a social media profile with a few dozen text posts, a profile photo, and a 15 second sample of their voice.

      I really don’t get how every single person isn’t just having a daily existential crisis questioning the nature of their present reality given what’s coming.

      Do people just think the current trends aren’t going to continue, or just don’t think about the notion that what happens in the future could in fact have been their own nonlocal past?

      It reminds me of a millennia old saying by a group that were claiming we were copies in the images of original humans: “you do not know how to examine the present moment.”

      Edit - bonus saying on the topic: “When you see your likeness, you are happy. But when you see your images that came into being before you and that neither die nor become visible, how much you will have to bear!”

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Since it’s trained on celebrities, can it do ugly people or would it try to make them prettier in animation?

    The teeth change sizes, which is kinda weird, but probably fixable.

    It’s not too hard to notice for an up close face shot, but if it was farther away it might be hard - the intonation and facial expressions are spot on. They should use this to re-do all the digital faces in Star Wars.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes I hate what AI is becoming capable of. Last year everyone was laughing at the shitty fingers, but were quickly moving past that. I’m concerned that in the near future it will be hard to tell truth from fiction.

  • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The “why would they make this” people don’t understand how important this type of research is. It’s important to show what’s possible so that we can be ready for it. There are many bad actors already pursuing similar tools if they don’t have them already. The worst case is being blindsided by something not seen before.

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      how important this type of research

      I hope they also figure a way to find the bad actors who might use their tools for harmful purposes. You can’t just create something for “research” purposes like this and not find a way to stop bad actors using these for harmful purposes.