• Gaylactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s an easy one to answer. If they divorce, they have to split their possessions. If one of the partner dies, the other gets to inherit all, if no will is made to state otherwise.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plus it isn’t just about the literal stuff, it is about not letting her have any stuff. Like if he didn’t keep everything, then he would see himself as ‘losing’.

      It’s petty selfishness all the way down.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      If they divorce, they have to split their possessions

      Better murder another human being then?! That’s a foolproof plan

      To me just easier to walk away with half than literally murder someone

      I don’t think I’ll ever get it

      • Gaylactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        But that’s not what they are thinking. For them, they think it’s easier to escape justice, otherwise, why commit a crime that lands you decades of not even the rest of your life behind bars? If that was the case, then laws would be obsolete and pointless. Laws exist not only to punish, but also to serve as deterrence. Obviously some people like this dumbass, think they are smarter and can get away!