AMD claims that the new Ryzen 9 7945X3D with a whopping 144MB cache is the fastest mobile gaming processor on the planet, and that it’s more than 15 percent faster than the Ryzen 9 7945HX on average. It has 16 cores, 32 threads, up to 5.4 Ghz boost speeds and 55W+ TDP. The CPU is built on the Zen 4 architecture.

  • panda_paddle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t wait to read the Userbenchmark review telling me why this chip is actually garbage and how only idiots buy AMD.

    • notepass@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      "When using all 16 cores at a TDP of 5 watts, it is actually a lot slower then the core i3-1969UwU, making it pretty useless for battery operation. Consider buying an intel CPU.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m an idiot that’s only ever had problems with Intel. Weirdly, same with AMD/ATI graphics. Only AMD CPU/APUs and GeForce GPUs for this idiot, here.

  • notepass@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is absolutely ridiculous. Looking at what we get out of mobile CPUs today, when I have a laptop with an i7-7700HQ from 2017 that has… 4 cores/8 threads and is turboing to somewhere in the mid 3GhZ range. With a 45W TDP.

    The last 5 years have been such a turbo charging for CPUs

    • symcal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that means I can get consistent crazy performance on a 55W laptop chip then I don’t see a problem. Once we hit the limit of Moore’s law I suspect we will see many clever innovations and I personally can’t wait.

  • Varixable@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ryzen 9 7945X3D

    I don’t know why this name is so funny to me. It just seems so much more ridiculous than an evenly named Ryzen 9 79500X3D. Like what, were getting 45 more units worth of a Ryzen 9 7900X3D, but not quite enough units for a Ryzen 9 7982X3D?

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because the 7900 and 7950 are using an “old” naming scheme and the 7945 is using a new naming scheme.

      • 7 = released in 2023
      • 9 = Ryzen 9
      • 4 = Zen 4
      • 5 = mobile/APU

      One of the side effects of this is that bigger number no longer necessarily means better, especially if you’re comparing between architectures

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s because the 7900 and 7950 are using an “old” naming scheme and the 7945 is using a new naming scheme.

    • 7 = released in 2023
    • 9 = Ryzen 9
    • 4 = Zen 4
    • 5 = mobile/APU

    One of the side effects of this is that bigger number no longer necessarily means better, especially if you’re comparing between architectures