• TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Too late Broadcom. You dun fucked up.

    Milking customers only works if they can’t go anywhere else. Too bad dozens of different virtual machine hypervisors exist. Docker is also a thing (I know it’s not a VM but it more or less serves the same purpose).

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Really, this is just a wakeup call for everyone that was putting of going cloud native on apps. The potential costs of staying in VMWare are now higher than migrating, plus now there’s the added incentive of getting rid of ancient technical debt. Overall, it’s a good thing from a security and long-term cost standpoint for most of these businesses.

      • med@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Doesn’t help the microsoft was playing chicken with the upcoming EOL for supported on-prem exchange. What are people even going to run on their vmware? /s

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the corporate equivalent of “Oops we fucked up and customers noticed.”

    I doubt it will stem the flow after already ditching partners like AWS. As an ICT consultant with two decades of experience with VMware, I’m not recommending this platform any longer and this announcement won’t change that. I doubt that I’m an outlier in this view, time will tell.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s not a reversal, it’s a minor adjustment to keep companies from leaving, so they can jack the prices again next year.

    They see the writing - Enterprises are adjusting by moving to solutions like Proxmox (or vendors who provide the full package support), which will drive a need for the Linux KVM skillset. This will in turn expand that skillset, enabling more SMBs to run KVM.

    Note that KVM is more performant than VMware, and that VMware has already switched VMware Workstation to KVM. Yep, their own desktop app is no longer their own code, but a shell on KVM.

    Die in a fire CEO. VMware was the go-to since about 2006. It will now get supplanted by versions of KVM.

  • Suzune@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    IT departments noticed there are more viable options than VMWare. Thanks Broadcom!

  • ranting_sandfish@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    This change doesn’t even have anything to do with customers as far as I can tell? Sounds like they pissed off their resellers by cutting them out of deals with their biggest accounts, and are regretting burning all those bridges.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh they’re selling VMware? Because them buying it was the controversial part that spurred people to migrate. Everything else was expected.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    We got the fuck out as soon as the writing was on the wall. Wait, you want me to pay how much for VMware with new features other than using all my cores?

    Well let’s look at my options, proxmox is 2.5% of my VMware price? Jesus…