• thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    He emphasized that the proposed tariffs would leave companies with no choice but to invest in domestic production facilities to avoid high taxes.

    No choice except the obvious: Pass the cost of the Tax into the customer because there’s no way they’re going to spend billions to stand up a US fab plant anytime soon.

  • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    If TSMC doesn’t want to set up shop in the USA, are the USA going to be able to produce chips on par with what TSMC can fab?

    • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 days ago

      they are building a plant in Arizona, but i doubt it’ll ever be as good as Taiwan can do, not just because Taiwan has the skills but if Taiwan doesn’t have this then what’s the point of protecting it? It’s sort of a way to say, if you want to to continue to access the best chips in the world you should protect us from China

    • TheDezzick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 days ago

      The US could probably do it… With hundreds of billions of government incentives to rapidly stand up the entire supply chain… Which would still take at least a decade. The machines that TSMC uses are made by ASML and themselves have a global supply chain of over 500 separate companies and are backordered for several years due to their inherent value.

      In short, no.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Intel has been trying to get itself into that position for years, with huge amounts of public money being pumped in, and it is struggling so badly the company lost patience and fired the CEO who had the best chance of getting this done. And, as others have said, it doesn’t look like TSMC is about to let its US fabs do the most advanced stuff even if they could.

      So this move will just make the best technology less accessible to the USA and tech products more expensive for Americans, for the foreseeable future.

    • Acidbath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      From what I understand one of the things that is protecting Taiwan from China is their fabs. They will fight for their lives to make sure they are protected by this.

      As someone with family over in Taiwan, I really want them to be okay. Things are getting depressing globally.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    To avoid this, the administration would need to introduce exemptions, just like it did with China-made graphics cards and motherboards years ago.

    If that is the approach, it would ensure tech monopoly for 5 years for all of the oligarchy that kisses his diaper.

    More major issues with this is that while high end Chip production may be high value manufacturing, motherboards, electronics, and assembly is not, and there would likely be an export of chips to somewhere else to import finished products.

    US/Trump explicit hatred for world is likely to get retributive tariffs, that makes chip plants unproductive investments, though Trump is hoping to have high foreign ownership/investment in those plants.

    In 2022, the export share of Taiwan integrated circuits to US was just 2.46%, although in early 2024, total (all goods) Taiwan exports had US take lead over China for the first time.

    That both US and China are decoupling from Taiwan is going to reduce any geopolitical subservience impulse that provokes a war with China. Taiwan may get closer to China instead of begging for more US “friendship”.

  • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    But I thought the Tim Apple donation to the trump inauguration was supposed to curry enough favor to avoid this.

    ThisIsMySurpisedFace.jpg.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t get the goal here. It’s not just that existing fabs are in Taiwan, I thought it was the knowledge was as well.

    I was under the impression that we’d built a couple of fabs here and they’re not productive due to a knowledge deficit. Maybe I’m uninformed.

    It seems, to my uninformed self, that if we impose tariffs we’d be strengthening Taiwan/China relations. Wouldn’t China still serve as a middle man?

    I don’t see us manufacturing when the dollar is so high relative to foreign currency; add in the lack of knowledge and facilities and I’m not sure what you get.

  • 7rokhym@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Awesome! Send them to Canada, we can build data centres and sell the cloud services back to Americans powered by the electricity that we expect to be tarriffed, and cooled by the water we won’t sell.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Maybe it’ll bring chip prices down to Rest of the World™ to clear stock. Thanks Trump!

  • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    People hyped for the Nvidia 5000 series better get their cards before prices skyrocket across the board. I guess graphics cards weren’t expensive enough or something.

    Really though, no brand is safe from the soon-to-be insane prices if this does go through as a blanket tariff without exceptions. Better to err on the safe side and upgrade soon as you can, if you need to and you’re not too wealthy to care.

    • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      world going down faster than ur sister on a Friday night but PC parts go BRRrRRRRRrrrrRRRrRRRR

  • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I say this not to be reactionary or pro trump.

    Is there no way to use lesser nodes for wider applications? While there are processes that need as much speed as possible, I feel like what gives Taiwan semiconducting industries such great business is the fact that code optimization isn’t as cost effective as the latest and greatest chips.

    I HOPE these tariffs inspire better, more secure code to make less efficient chips more viable. Like a lemon to lemonade situation.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      If you optimize code, it will still run faster if the CPU or GPU is 30% faster.

      If you make 50% speed improvements with code, you get 65% improvement with code+hardware upgrades. The hardware multiplies your software gains.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Also, half of the gains in recent years have been in energy efficiency, not just speed.

        So if the idea is to do more with less, you don’t wanna rely on old power-hungry designs.