• Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The irony with all these oligarch statements is that if an employee applies their economic philosophy in a direct manner, the outcome would be that the employees’ sole goal should be to work as little as possible to gain as much money as possible while not getting fired.

    You want to optimize your return per hour if you are salaried. It would make logical sense that you need to lower the amount of hours worked to get the highest possible return on a per hour basis.

    You would also want to focus on approaches that make it difficult to fire you as opposed to focusing on organizational goals.

    I am not saying I agree or disagree with this approach, there are clearly many issues with what I am saying (other poor souls will have to pick up the slack for your laziness), just highlighting the inherent contradictions of oligarch propaganda.

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      This is what I’ve been doing for over 10 years, I get promotions/raises regularly. Make yourself indispensable and easy to work with, but also do as little as possible. People will love you for it, because you’re always calm, laid back, and save the day regularly. The work you’re not doing is irrelevant, if the work you do is appreciated.

    • topperharlie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      that’s what Americans voted, wasn’t it clear?

      I know Europe tends to follow America’s trends to some extent, but I really hope this is not one of them.

      BTW, In the past I worked for many hours being fooled by my employer thinking it was a spike, and there is a moment where the productivity just drops, at least in engineering the idea of + hours +work is just stupid. Which scares me, because CEOs all over the world are stupid as fuck.

  • doug@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Startup idea: OkCupid but for communes. Matchmake a commune of people together. Can chunks of society go on without these management leeches?

    • felixwhynot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Startup idea: Kickstarter for funding cooperative housing builds. Get the land, design, and money together. Site provides suggested Co-op agreements. When enough people buy in, we break ground and build it

      • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’d be perfect.

        I can’t believe how hard it is to find people willing, even on a completely theoretical level, to live in a little bit more closer knit community with some shared facilities and land for common goods. Even if I say it need not be the cliche hippie commune, it can just be people living co-operatively and having just a bit more together time, simultaneously even saving some money and resources, by having shared facilities and lands. Most recognize just one thing about it. Energy and water treatment self-sufficiency seems to interest people, but not enough for them to even consider a shared community “hall” with a kitchen and room for everyone to eat, so that a every single house need not have a full, everything included kitchen. Same for bath and toilet stuff. And electricity utility rooms. Or anything, really, that isn’t your own personal and private as usual living quarters with the basic facilities so you don’t need to be social every time you need to pee or have a breakfast.

        I recognize this is practically just an apartment building, but in a horizontally laid out format, I guess, with some space between the apartments for personal space even outside, and some extra niceties like an all-inclusive kitchen with a full set of tools and facilities to cook practically anything, without everyone having to buy all of that individually and also with a fraction of the cost for being shared between all. And some crops for a bit more self-sufficiency, same for electricity and water facilities.

        People are fine with large apartment buildings where you can practically always hear your neighbors and have some minor shared stuff like saunas and very basic recreative rooms and the usual utilities like electricity and water and yard maintenance handled by someone else.

        I feel like a close knit community — with shared spaces for stuff you don’t need 24/7 but rather only occasionally and in limited periods each day, and increased self-reliance and independence and more national-catastrophe-resistant facilities, with the understanding that some of the lots are saved for specific professionals like an electrician, farmer, animal handler, plumber, etc and require minor extra investment, shared between all, to pay for them handling the day-to-day — would win in almost all fronts against an apartment building, except maybe in that it would have to be a little more remote in location because extra land needs and need for appropriate soil for crops etc. But a commune like that could easily just have a shuttle or two and arrange co-rides even each day to the nearest town or city. Could even save on personal cars by having that.

        I don’t know, I’m rambling now.

        I get frustrated because I’m probably not seeing the value other see in living alone, separate from others living alone all around you. Or the proximity to more densely populated areas maybe? Or whatever it is that makes people not even consider a community such as the one described. There must be a lot of things I’m not seeing that normal people see, and it makes me so anxious that I can’t see them. But then again I’m not neurotypical. Not the first area of interest I seldom get to share with someone, anyone.

        • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          I bought some land and spent the last 3 years converting it into something usable for an intentional community.

          Community I always thought the hardest part would be getting the land drilling a well sitting up solar etc. in fact, the hardest part is convincing people that you are serious about letting them come live on your land as long as they help work.

          I’ve even taken to offering one dollar 99 year leases so that people could feel like they have some agency over the piece of land they choose to live on.

          No bites yet

        • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes. This touches on my dream to buy land and add tiny homes to build a community. Just as you describe. Common areas, sports areas, community centre, education centre, etc. Including wells, wind, solar, farming…

          I’m getting too old to realize it, but I keep running it through my mind.

  • PeteZa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Jokes on them. I am literally changing careers right now. One where I will have the freedom to make my own schedule. The well of IT jobs in Texas is drying up fast.

    • d7sdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      What are you going to do in the future, I am open for ideas too. Did you work in IT?

      • PeteZa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yea I was a sysadmin for a while. Now I am joining another startup for espresso machine repair. There is apparently a solid market for it. Those machines need to be maintained, much like a car… and people will always drink espresso. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    There’s not even credible evidence, yet, that A.G.I is even possible (edit: as a human designed intentional outcome, to concede the point that nature has accomplished it, lol. Edit 2: Wait, the A stands for Artificial. Not sure I needed edit 1, after all. But I’m gonna leave it.) much less some kind of imminent race. This is some “just in case P=NP” bullshit.

    Also, for the love of anything, don’t help fucking “don’t be evil was too hard for us” be the ones to reach AGI first, if you’re able to help.

    If Google does achieve AGI first, SkyNet will immediately kill Sergei, anyway, before it kills the rest of us.

    It’s like none of these clowns have ever read a book.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Of course AGI is possible, human brains can’t violate P=NP any more than silicon can.

      Our current approach may be flawed for sure, but there’s nothing special about nature compared to technology, other than the fact it’s had a billion times longer to work on its tech.