• SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Agree. I do not speak to the machine. It does not speak to me. It is a happy arrangement.

    I can see the use as an accessibility aid, but nothing more.

    • med@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      All I have ever wanted from a machine is to be able to say, “I’m busy right now, but I’ve had a thought; here - hold this for me”…

      …without it telling anyone me and my partner’s batting average.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I use it to do things at the same time as other things. I can add something to the shopping list when I’m cooking or turn on the fan when I’m getting ready for bed without stopping what I’m doing to click buttons. I find that it’s really good for things that can’t easily be automated but you also can’t (or don’t want to) put on a physical button.

      I actually use Alexa as I haven’t had time to investigate HA voice control but the principle is the same.

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        No Alexa here for more reasons than just being a voice assistant.

        None of them would particularly useful to me even if I didn’t hate them, due to a lot of hearing loss. Real voices are hard enough and the ones from a speaker are worse. Anything from a PA system is unintelligible.

        Most things we have automated with sensors, schedules and buttons. Not much else to be done that can’t be done with a few seconds of infrequent manual input, or shortcut software button on device.

        I think I’m dead set on this. It’s nice to see others getting along, but I’ll never want it.