shrewdcat@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 24 days agoFan of Flatpaks ...or Not?lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square309fedilinkarrow-up1772arrow-down163
arrow-up1709arrow-down1external-linkFan of Flatpaks ...or Not?lemmy.mlshrewdcat@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 24 days agomessage-square309fedilink
minus-squareT Jedi@bolha.forumlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·24 days agoSystem themes, probably most of them work. But most of them don’t bother watching the user themes or icons folder. I don’t think Flatseal is that useful for the majority of users, no. But it is a good tool to have in mind when the need arises.
minus-squareOutwit1294@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoWhy do you think it is not useful? I replaced Firefox system package with Flatpak because I think browser is the most used and vulnerable thing in my system. And the size seemed reasonable. I did not replace Thunderbird because its size is almost 10 times.
minus-squareDanWolfstone@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·24 days agoThe person you’re replying to is talking about the permissions manager flatseal, not flatpaks
System themes, probably most of them work. But most of them don’t bother watching the user themes or icons folder.
I don’t think Flatseal is that useful for the majority of users, no. But it is a good tool to have in mind when the need arises.
Why do you think it is not useful?
I replaced Firefox system package with Flatpak because I think browser is the most used and vulnerable thing in my system. And the size seemed reasonable.
I did not replace Thunderbird because its size is almost 10 times.
The person you’re replying to is talking about the permissions manager flatseal, not flatpaks
Oops. I got confused