Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFirefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square173fedilinkarrow-up1787arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1773arrow-down1external-linkFirefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square173fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·23 hours agoRefusal to make a “political” statement is very much political when the politics in question is about acknowledging non-men exist. There is no politically neutral choice when there are two options who are both political.
minus-squarePushButton@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·14 hours agoThat’s totally false. One can write using the generic masculine form without making a political statement. This is not even close to not acknowledge there is non-men in this world. What you are putting forward is absurd. No one is saying that only men exist anywhere in here.
Refusal to make a “political” statement is very much political when the politics in question is about acknowledging non-men exist. There is no politically neutral choice when there are two options who are both political.
That’s totally false.
One can write using the generic masculine form without making a political statement.
This is not even close to not acknowledge there is non-men in this world.
What you are putting forward is absurd. No one is saying that only men exist anywhere in here.