Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前Firefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1851arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1837arrow-down1external-linkFirefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前message-square204fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 天前I use it on mobile. It’s mostly OK tbh, and the addition of a working ad blocker means it’s far better than Chrome for me. In fairness that is an invalid URL in my book, but it should at least be consistent across desktop and mobile, or at least tucked behind an option.
minus-squareStabbitha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 天前Web standards don’t care about “your book”, spaces in URLs are valid.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 天前No. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt
I use it on mobile. It’s mostly OK tbh, and the addition of a working ad blocker means it’s far better than Chrome for me.
In fairness that is an invalid URL in my book, but it should at least be consistent across desktop and mobile, or at least tucked behind an option.
Web standards don’t care about “your book”, spaces in URLs are valid.
No.
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt