Stay motivated, it’ll come,” answered his 19-year-old contact. He went on to offer the child 150,000 kronor ($13,680) to carry out a murder, as well as clothes and transport to the scene of the crime, according to a police investigation of the exchange last year in the western province of Varmland seen by AFP.

In this case, four men aged 18 to 20 are accused of recruiting four minors aged 11 to 17 to work for a criminal gang. All were arrested before carrying out the crimes. The preliminary inquiry contains a slew of screenshots that the youngsters sent to each other of themselves posing with weapons, some with bare chests or donning hooded masks.

Questioned by police, the 11-year-old said he wrote the message to seem “cool” and “not show his fear”. The case is not an isolated one.

Sweden has struggled to rein in a surge in gang shootings and bombings across the country in recent years, linked to score-settling and battles to control the drug market. Last year, 53 people were killed in shootings, increasingly in public with innocent victims also dying.

Sweden’s gang crime is organised and complex with gang leaders operating from abroad through intermediaries who use encrypted messaging sites like Telegram, Snapchat and Signal to recruit teens under 15, the age of criminal responsibility.

It is organised as a kind of (job) market where missions are published on discussion forums, and the people accepting the assignments are increasingly young,” Johan Olsson, the head of the Swedish police’s National Operations Department (NOA), told reporters last month.

Hits are subcontracted with the parties only communicating online, Stockholm University criminology professor Sven Granath told AFP. Others recruit in person, seeking out kids hanging around in their neighbourhoods. […] Granath said the children who are recruited are often struggling in school, have addiction problems or attention deficit disorders, or have already been in trouble with the law. “They are recruited into conflicts they have no connection to – they’re just mercenaries,” he said, adding that they haven’t necessarily been a member of a gang before.

The number of murder-related cases in Sweden where a suspect is under the age of 15 rose from 31 in the first eight months of 2023 to 102 in the same period this year, according to the Prosecution Authority.

Some children even seek out the contracts, according to a report from the National Council for Crime Prevention (BRA), as they look for cash, an adrenaline rush, recognition or a sense of belonging. They’re drawn in by flashy clothes as well as the promise of undying loyalty, experts say.

Nowadays everybody wants to be a murderer,” Viktor Grewe, a 25-year-old former gang member who had his first run-in with police when he was 13, told AFP. “It’s incredibly sad to see that this is what kids aspire to,” he said, with some “crimfluencers” glorify criminal lifestyles on TikTok.

There is a “ruthless exploitation of young people”, Tony Quiroga, a police commander in Orebro, west of Stockholm, told AFP. The criminal subcontractors “don’t want to take any risks themselves”, he said, protecting both themselves and those higher up the chain.

According to a recent BRA report, recruiting kids is part of the gangs’ business model, where children recruit even younger children – and once they’re in, it’s hard to leave.

  • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    … score-settling and battles to control the drug market. …

    So legalize all drugs, stupid. You already made Systembolaget to sell dangerous intoxicants so that gangsters can’t compete and people don’t go blind or die from impurites or drinking too much of unknown strength.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    28 days ago

    Sounds like significantly stronger deterrence is needed. Being “just” 15 is hardly an excuse to let someone get away with even plotting murder. You cannot let people grow up with a mindset where that’s ok. The age of legal responsibility should be lower imho, but even if you’re under, you should still be put in state custody for that shit. At least for some time, to ge things sorted and as a warning shot. And again, I’m talking plotting murder, not even having a gun or shooting it.

    Also, hiring kids for murder should be charged as if you yourself carried out or attempted to carry out the murder. You use a stupid kid as a smart tool. Putting a gun in a kids hand and telling them to shoot someone is in no way better, arguably even worse than doing it yourself imo.

    Also maybe finally start to properly regulate social media ffs. It’s literally turning people into violent idiots and threats to society.

    • piyuv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      28 days ago

      From another article from the same blog:

      Given that Musk grew up in South Africa, he’s almost guaranteed to know about Black-White IQ gaps and crime rates

      The author is deeply racist, just so you didn’t know. Anything they write, their whole blog, should be taken with huge amounts of salt. They also think

      • Elon Musk is so good for us he should clone himself.
      • JD Vance is an intellectual.
      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        JD Vance is an intellectual. Doesn’t mean he’s a good one nor does it mean any of his ideas are any good. Hitler was an intellectual too. It’s a very low bar!

        Basically all you have to do is think about society’s issues and come up with your own solutions which you traditionally would publish in a book. Vance wrote a book though it was as much a memoir as a meditation on society’s issues (in his view).

        • piyuv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Intellectual - noun: a person possessing a highly developed intellect

          I don’t think JD Vance makes the cut.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            Try Wikipedia:

            An intellectual is a person who engages in critical thinking, research, and reflection about the reality of society, and who proposes solutions for its normative problems.

            Coming from the world of culture, either as a creator or as a mediator, the intellectual participates in politics, either to defend a concrete proposition or to denounce an injustice, usually by either rejecting, producing or extending an ideology, and by defending a system of values.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        28 days ago

        Cool, that doesn’t dismiss the problem or the accuracy of the data.

        We can make an effort to acknowledge and address it or you can hide behind “racism” and then have an election like the US has had where the racists offered solutions to problems that the left was slow to address.

        • piyuv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          28 days ago

          I’m not living in any Nordic country so I can’t speak for those, but this “migrants cause crime” argument exists in any developed country. There are a lot of articles debunking the claims. I like John Oliver’s debunking since it’s pretty easy to understand: https://youtu.be/axsgzg3RyF0

          When any deep analysis is conducted, the arguments from racists simply don’t hold water. They offer simple, racist, and hateful explanations to very complex problems.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            They offer simple, racist, and hateful explanations to very complex problems.

            Which is easy for the general population to understand and get behind when they are looking for solutions to problems affecting their society.

            Ignore their concerns at your own peril.

            • BluesF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              28 days ago

              Are you saying that despite the fact the argument is based in racism rather than reality, we should act as if it was real, because people believe it?

              • shalafi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                Nothing stated by OP was non-factual. Including the last bit. In other news, Trump just won the Presidency, again. Based on:

                simple, racist, and hateful explanations to very complex problems

                Yet liberals ignored their concerns… Did I mention Trump was elected again?

                I’m sorry, is this all making you uncomfortable?