• Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do you think it was a mistake? They put themselves in the spot where taking back just the most egregious fees will be considered a victory by the users while in reality the company basically got what they were hoping for.

    It’s like on a Turkish bazaar when you buy a fake jersey. He will ask for 800 lira and then you talk him down to 400 and feel like a winner, but the jersey is maybe worth 100.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t be considered a victory. The developers have already lost Unity, and Unity has already lost its developers. Even if they undo everything, the trust is permanently damaged. What developer will dare to make a multi year, million dollar bet on Unity after this?

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just so you know, this isn’t the first time Unity does this - last time they potentially enabled literal malware and forced privacy violating software on users and developers alike. Games using Unity still came out after that debacle.

    • provomeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, I thought it was obvious I was sarcastic about their “mistake”. They want to be seen as the victims like they didn’t know in advance the outcome of their decisions. Backing down on the changes only to show something “less worst” is only a way to make the pill easier to swallow. Unity cannot be trusted anymore.