balderdash@lemmy.zip to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agoPower Sourceslemmy.zipimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1695arrow-down1105
arrow-up1590arrow-down1imagePower Sourceslemmy.zipbalderdash@lemmy.zip to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squareLoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-22 years agoNot a good solution for most of the world, but great for where it can be done, same as geothermal.
minus-squareOrcocracy [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoTidal, hydroelectric dams, and geothermal should all together be able to cover a pretty significant part of the Earth, shouldn’t they?
minus-squarealcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoTidal and hydroelectric aren’t great for nature.
minus-squareOrcocracy [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYeah a dam will wreck a valley. But a nuclear station can irradiate a whole region and coal ruins the planet.
Not a good solution for most of the world, but great for where it can be done, same as geothermal.
Tidal, hydroelectric dams, and geothermal should all together be able to cover a pretty significant part of the Earth, shouldn’t they?
Tidal and hydroelectric aren’t great for nature.
Yeah a dam will wreck a valley. But a nuclear station can irradiate a whole region and coal ruins the planet.