At a time of growing concern over the power of the world’s mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft.

In less than three months’ time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft’s ubiquitous programs at work.

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Working with information today could be hundreds of times better if there were serious open standards. Switching away from outdated proprietary junk, to an open source version of that junk is great, but late. And, let’s hope, its the start of real change. To catch up to where we should have been decades ago if we hadn’t been held back by lazy MS et al. Digital information should zip between people and have real meaning. Not have to go through a thick layer of IT, and files and formats, and redundant copies, and silos and having to know tech to get things done. Peoples expectations are so low, they are satisfied with the crap we have today.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re way off here. Microsoft are the industry leaders in this space because they’re so far ahead of everyone else because they focus on this stuff. They’re far from lazy, they’re the opposite in fact. As someone who manages the whole MS suite from entra to dev ops all the way to managed instance dbs and defender and everything in between daily, their integration across everything and their pace of updates is insane.

      What products specifically are you calling “outdated junk” and why?

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I can also explain Microsoft’s straglehold on enterprise/government/institutional IT in two words: Group Policy. Nothing - absolutely nothing - from any other OS maker comes close to the granular level of configurability, customisation and flexibility that comes with Group Policy, not even ChromeOS or iOS.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      hadn’t been held back by lazy MS et al.

      MS is not lazy but working hard to maintain their lead.

      edit: Just noticed that my phrasing is bad and could be seen as praise. OP is right, MS is holding everybody back.

      I meant to say that they abuse their market domination to maintain their lead.

      Look at MS Teams. It was free until Slack was done as a competitor.

      MS did things but that’s inevitable. The crucial part are the things that they prevented.

      It’s increadible that OP is even downvoted.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Teams is just an incomprehensible version of Discord. What’s the open source version of that? Matrix?

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Incomprehensible? How? It’s got team/channel chats, private chats, and meetings. What makes it stand out is, like everything else MS does, the integration across all their services.

      It definitely needs some improvement, but “incomprehensible” it isn’t.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I would say “even busier” and “over-integrated” rather than “incomprehensible”.

        Not to start a fight or anything, but it almost reminds me of emacs, because it’s like someone started with an idea for one kind of program, but they just kept adding and adding and adding to it. But emacs at least is free, flexible, long established, free, and quirky.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    At my work all but me love microsoft. But … They started to complain about teams too. I only use the chat because it’s impossible to avoid.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Literally no one I work with likes Teams but we keep using it because that’s just what we do. Other options basically don’t exist simply by virtue of being either not Microsoft or not overwhelmingly the market leader.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So you’re saying that other options do exist but some companies don’t want to use them because Microsoft is very popular, which is kind of a circular thing, and I understand, but it’s a sign of laziness, not quality.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m definitely in the minority, but i really never had or have any issues with Windows or Teams like everyone seems to complain so much about. With that said, I absolutely love that they are making this move. As someone who works in the area and sees the pricing and how much our company spends on Microsoft I find it appalling and absurd that anyone is willing to spend that much on licensing… I wish I could work on a project like this just to see what the savings could be overall.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The worst part for teams is if you do contract work and need to be a part of multiple teams instances… It’s a MASSIVE fucking pain. Microsoft’s login processes are absolute infuriating and even more so if you have to log in to multiple different accounts that all somehow have the same email address but different tenants without letting you know which account version is for which tenant.

      We had to use slack for our internal stuff so we could always be in contact with each other because you could only be signed into one teams instance at a time without jumping through crazy hoops.

      I initially wanted us to move to teams but that hurdle stopped us. I’m kinda glad in hindsight.

    • 10001110101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Used Teams for a bit. Seemed fine, just used it like any other IRC clone. Didn’t use it for video. Windows has a lot of annoyances; death by a thousand cuts. The Windows ecosystem also sucks: to the point where graphic card and mouse driver installers try to install spyware.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I get it! It’s a fucking terrible program. At the moment I’ve got two instances of it running, one old and one new. Why the fuck? Why doesn’t all the old things transfer to the new one?

    It’s also a joke to maneuver. The different subjects have “hidden” subcategories that aren’t supposed to be hidden but are! So you have two extra clicks to find the folder… it’s a giant fucking joke that a company the size of MS can’t make this tolerable.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Channels get hidden when they’re inactive for a decent amount of time. To see them you just view all the channels in a team. Not really hard. Can also just then tick to always show it. This is a PICNIC situation.

      I’m guessing your 2 instances are the personal one that is included with windows, and then the work one. You can’t have 2 instances of the same one installed.

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Do you like work for Microsoft or something, you’re all over this post

    • richieadler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It crashes, it loses things, it has a lousy search function, to automate messaging you need to learn one of the arcane and convoluted MS services because they deprecated the much easier webhooks…

      When something fails (and it always does) we just say “Well… it’s Teams”, and that sums it up.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Same. I’ve come to terms using it in browser mode on Edge, same for Outlook. The desktop applications are so horrific, I uninstalled both. Half the time they wouldn’t work or force log me out.

      Now I literally have a standalone screen that’s showing nothing but Edge with those two tabs on, and all my productive environment is on a nice large screen where I don’t have to see the crap.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Any suggestions on alternatives?

      Slack is ok but proprietary.

      Element is a new and eg fractal doesn’t have threading.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Sorry to say, but no idea.

        We used separate applications for seven years (Jabber for IM and Asana for ticket management), and for me, that’s what I’m stuck with using Teams for, at least until Microsoft drops AI into and it eats itself.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The whole article is a good read but this is the important bit:

    Instead, the northern state will turn to open-source software to “take back control” over data storage and ensure “digital sovereignty”, its digitalisation minister, Dirk Schroedter, told AFP.

    They also blame Trump which is pretty hilarious but probably not terribly relevant to the community.

  • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I never understood how a huge government can’t be bothered to host their own nextcloud or whatever for a couple dozen mil per year instead of spending hundreds of millions per year on onedrive and other commercial crap.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Governments are usually inhabited by older folks, that aren’t too tech savvy.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Legal liability for when the service, inevitably, gets breached. If the government hosts it, they’re liable. If the vendor hosts it, the vendor is liable. Simple as money matters.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Spread responsibility thinly across as many organizations and departments within those organizations and across as many legal thresholds as you can to minimize blowback when something inevitably has to be held to account.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        So they could just use a service offered by (checks notes) T-Systems, Siemens, Lufthansa Systems, SAP, TeamViewer AG,… what’s that? In all these years these companies were relying on US service providers as well, instead of innovating? Well that sucks.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Linux is great for government work.

        They dont need compatibility as much. They have their systems only they use, therefore they can easily make them on Linux or emulate.

        Otherwise they need a office suite like Libre.

        And there’s money to save. Benefits the whole country.

        • dan@upvote.au
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They have their systems only they use, therefore they can easily make them on Linux or emulate.

          Also, a lot of systems are web-based (and therefore automatically multi-platform) these days.

            • Balder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              So with all this AI usage, surely developing for all browsers should be a breeze now, right? Right??

          • Addv4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Don’t forget, most computers are faster on Linux than on the newest windows version, so you can hold off on upgrades for longer if the hardware is physically fine, which just further decreases costs.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              I have a Dell laptop from 2013 I’m running Mint on 🫡

              Granted, I’m only using it for web browsing and note taking, but still.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 hours ago

            SteamOS is not a good desktop distribution, which isn’t surprising as it’s not supposed to be one. It’s specialised for handhelds.

            Go install Ubuntu or something, really anything, ideally don’t have an Nvidia GPU, install steam, done. SteamOS has no special sauce regarding running games.