• prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    1970 was during the cultural revolution. In that year, the world population was 3.68 billion, and the population if China was just shy of 830 million - China had 22% of the world’s population, so if they held (only) 20% of the world’s prisoners, they’d have a lower than average incarceration rate.

    The same is not true for the US today, we have less than 5% of the world’s population today.

  • veganbtw@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    ITT: Liberals who assume that evil Chinese MUST be lying about their statistics but the above board whites of the USA are not.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s too hilarious it can’t be intentional that the top country not America is El Salvador which is where you’re questionably sending all your black and brown people.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I went to business school in the US about a decade ago (stayed full time engineer and happy about it) and I can absolutely see business schools unironically studying the process of privatizing and offshoring prisons as it relates to other more ethical and humane enterprises.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

      Can’t have anything to do with the fact that the US legally allows prisoner slavery right?

      Winder what the race ratio of the prison population is.

      This is the country routinely accusing other countries of having “prison camps.”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

        Legit amazed California wasn’t higher on the list. They’ve been doing mass-incarceration at an industrial scale since the 70s. But I guess the population is big enough that the per-capita statistics work out.

        States like Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma have such small and anemic populations and dedicate so much of their domestic budget to incarceration that they’re basically giant publicly subsidized slave plantations.

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Worthwhile note to people too lazy to click on the link is that this is the 2021 version. In June 2024 (which is linked at the top of the linked article) the numbers look a little different but not much better for the US.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I thought the states were being compared to other countries. Didn’t look properly on the phone.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes but that doesn’t really say much. We know it’s bad in the US. If all German states were bad that would still only tell you that in average it’s bad in Germany

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                not really. the fact that Louisiana has nearly double the rate of Oregon is significant. so is the fact that racist southern states are at the top and are the ones beating the us average.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            They are, and I agree it’s misleading. It’s implying that it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate. If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point. As it is, it’s stating the extremely obvious and framing it as “look, it’s even worse than you thought”.

            • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              It shows which US states contribute more to the US incarceration rate and clearly shows that even those that contribute the least are above the majority of the nations’ incarceration rates. The latter is not obvious without visualizing the data in this way.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point.

              If you have a population with 10M people and 20,000 of them are prisoners, that’s significantly less concerning than a country with 100,000 people of which 10,000 are prisoners. You can’t make an apples-to-apples comparison between Texas and Wyoming with raw head-count.

              it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate

              It’s shocking that the state of Louisiana has a full 2% of its population in jail. That’s twice the US national baseline.

              • LwL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                Yes, but that is not how the graph is framed. It’s framed as “look, if we put US states on a graph with other countries, they have such a high incarceration rate that there are almost no countries even on the graph!”

                If it was honest and just trying to compare the incarceration rate of US states amongst each other (and the national average) it wouldn’t be titled “[…] in U.S. states and all countries […]”. It’s a clearly manipulative title.

                The reason that a graph with this title could maybe make a point if it was absolute numbers is that most U.S. states’ population is less than most countries, so if individual states were still high on such a graph, that would be shocking.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  It’s framed as “look, if we put US states on a graph with other countries, they have such a high incarceration rate that there are almost no countries even on the graph!”

                  It’s certainly possible that you have one big state with a high incarceration rate - Texas or California for instance - that’s throwing off the national average. States are free to set their own penal process. It’s not a given that every state has a globe-shattering incarceration rate.

                  Saying “It’s not just one or two states with astronomical incarceration rates, its the whole country contributing to the total” indicates something notable about the politics and culture of the country as a whole.

                  Wyoming could have an incarceration rate of 0% without affecting America’s position as a carceral state. That it doesn’t is meaningful.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        How is a per-capita incarceration rate, with a reference to the superset included directly on the plot, misleading? Other than including more than El Salvador for the sake of external reference, which is almost certainly a size issue.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I thought the states were being compared to other countries. Didn’t look properly on the phone.

          • then_three_more@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are (which is the point) the countries are in orange USA (as an overall average) and el Salvador are the only countries that make it on to the list.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well yes because the US as a whole has a high number. If you added cities they would have even more in the high numbers. What’s the point about that?

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Because US states have populations and areas comparable to other countries. Just the US topping the charts is expected. How many states you have to get through to see other countries is interesting.

                • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  See? This makes it look like it’s as misleading as I said. This is prisoners per 100.000, that means it doesn’t matter how populous a state or country is. That’s exactly why comparing states with countries is misleading. For every state that has a higher number than the US average there’s states that have a lower number.

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    UHHH THATS JUST BECAUSE CHINA IS LYING HAHAA YOU REALLY BELIEVE THEIR OWN NUMBERS LOL??? oh third parties provided that data…. UHH WELL THEY DONT HAVE IPHONES AND THEYRE ALL POOR. oh… wait, they do have iphones now and china has a stronger middle working class than the US and canada?

    hold on i need to go watch my tv for a couple hours to get a few more talking points but im gonna come back to this post and fucking own you

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      CHINA ONLY PRODUCES GARBAGE BTW. oh what? They have actually quality products, they just ship out cheap garbage to suckers?

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    One is labeled as authoritarian dystopia while the other as a beacon of freedom, it’s like we live in the upside down.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Which part of comparing incarceration rates do you take issue with? Why is acknowledging the difference “mindless?”

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That’s all this post was about, though, a comparison showing that per capita (and totally), incarceration rates in the PRC is far lower than in the US Empire. The purpose is to highlight the hypocricy of those who hold the PRC as more repressive than the US Empire, when the opposite is abundantly clear to anyone looking at hard metrics such as incarceration rates.

          You decided to make a pivot in a completely different direction and just complain about Marxists, which just screams that you want attention more than anything. I suppose I’m providing that for you if that’s what you want, but really it’s just good practice to call out the incoherence of anti-communists.