• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’d think we’d have masks that don’t completely fail to do their job because you have .002 femtometers of hair sticking out of your face.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Fun fact, we have!

        This is racist horseshit and refusal to equip soldiers properly. Or more accurately, Marines who I’d wish were a little more vocal about the blatant fascism these days

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          I don’t see anywhere where it says to be compatible with a beard. Also, it says it protects from sandblasting and asbestos. Tear gas and the like are a very diffefent beast and get through smaller openings.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Even if we did… getting and keeping whatever that device would be functional on a battlefield is a whole different ball-game…

      War sucks…

      Edit: The easiest answer is a standard razor blade. It’s easy, simple, and light (and reuseable if needed… as much as they’re not really supposed to be). But that’s what causes problems.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The easiest answer for white guys with no razor burn.

        Or we could invent SCBA and full face masks and stop pretending this was ever about NBC