• justastranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      No but there’s no law against expelling a state from the union. Kind of a reverse secession if you can piss trump off enough for him to actually do it (no law saying that only Congress can expel them, so it would go to the courts).

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

      The Constitution of the US of frickin A

    • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      plus there is the bonus of schadenfreunde, since they always want to balkanize countries that happen to stand in their path.

  • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No. We’d be overrun by federal troops and decimated within a week. If we could secede peacefully? We (Wisconsin) would probably need an alliance with Minnesota and Michigan to survive.

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If just my state left, and I could leave to another state, that would be pretty good. Two Republican senators gone, roughly 15 net house reps gone, and an influx of dem refugees like me into neighboring states.

    Texas could legit try to make a go of it as an independent nation. It would be a disaster for my family though.

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If the Union completely dissolved and each state had to function as nation, it would be a massive boom for the oligarchs. They already have more money than most states.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I imagine they’d form blocs, on centred on California obviously, one on the other coast, and a few in between

  • PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yes. In fact, I’ve decided to take a leap of faith and join the California National Party, which you can all check out here: CNP website. I am sick of the usual Republicans vs Democrats. Everytime one party is in power, we are constantly worrying about the loss of civil and human rights. Lets start with a clean slate. If you are a California resident, at least check out their party platform. Also, in 2026, there will be a gubernatorial candidate for CNP. His name is Sean Forbes.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        but mexico has got way more parties than pri, so much that most candidates winning elections do so with a broad alliance. in fact since 2000 pri only had a single term.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Washingtonian here, I’ve been saying this should happen for like 8 years now lmao

    The marriage isn’t working. Let it go.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      We have had a name for it for awhile, my fellow Washingtonians call the Washington/Oregon/California union ‘Cascadia’. Wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you don’t take AZ and NV with you, you will get your Colorado River water cut off and lose a lot of farming power. That might even require UT. Unless it’s only Northern California included, in which case you still lose that agriculture, and possible land based trade lines to Mexico. It’s not a clean and pretty separation.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          That is a problem, but not an intractable one. The first easy win would be to just stop wasting so much water. CA could be a lot more careful with water than it is by just leaning on industry and ag to cut wasteful water use harder than it leans on the suburbs. Don’t get me wrong, green lawns in our Mediterranean climate are a stupid waste too, but it pencils out to less than a percent of all water use, where ag and industry are both in the double digits.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Fuck yeah! Cascadia! Let us stop funding this awful government and actually put our taxes towards improving people’s lives

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Absolutely, and I’m about ready to start identifying as that over American 🫠.

        I usually think of BC being part of it, too, cause we’re so similar culturally, and we hang out on each other’s side of the made up invisible line all the time.

        One can dream!

  • mat dave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t support it, only because my state wouldn’t be seperating to join the “good” side

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Californian. No.

    It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

    • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We’d have to spend a fortune on defense.

      We’d suffer massive losses from being cut off from interstate trade agreements.

      We’d have to deal with massive immigration issues.

      We’d probably get our shit pushed in from all the federal military bases within the state.

      I think it’s waaaay easier to just oust the current leadership and remove all the Congress members that aided and abetted.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Coloradan. Only if a neighboring State does, because if not, we are neighboring other borders and we would be landlocked without food or water imports. Its either all Pacific and Front Range States agree we have to split, or none of us can.

    Our most populous cities, Denver and CO Springs, are below the mountains, and are screwed in a combat scenario.

    I don’t see Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, or Kansas doing so willingly.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In American balkanization I imagine yall would be a battleground of the literal variety. Colorado and new Mexico would want to join Pacifica and Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming, and Montana likely won’t. But also you’re valuable enough to justify putting up a stink for