Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-226 days agoStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1369arrow-down18
arrow-up1361arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-226 days agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·25 days agoYeah, except science does not work like that. 😐
minus-squareslackassassin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·25 days agoYes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
minus-squareClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·25 days agoThis is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.
minus-squareslackassassin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoGood example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god.
Yeah, except science does not work like that. 😐
Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷
They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.
Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god.