• floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      But if you hate your data there’s no quicker way to lose it than a single 36TB Seagate drive.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t think the target audience of this drive is buying one. They are trying to optimize for density and are probably buying in bulk rather than paying the $800 price tag.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s roughly what I have now, and I only have about 200gb left, so I kind of wish I could get a little more right now. This is across 7 drives. I really hope storing data becomes faster and cheaper in the future because as it keeps growing over the past few decades, it gets longer and longer to replace and move this much data…

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        SSDs are getting crazy cheap.

        If you need 10tb of storage, you could get 2x used 10tb hdds in raid 1 for $200, but 6x used 2tb nvme in raid 5 is only $600 and 100x faster. Both take up the same amount of space.