• HouseWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Even not as far back at BF4 we have 3rd party host-able servers.

    They’re still quite active today with few cheaters because people developed server side anti-cheat plugins to monitor suspicious stats and keep a blacklist of known cheaters and their alt accounts.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      people developed server side anti-cheat plugins to monitor suspicious stats and keep a blacklist of known cheaters and their alt accounts

      hmmm as if there is a way to this with software and a bit of elbow grease…

      bad company 2 to BF4, the golden are of mil shooter. cod sucks!

      • CptBread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        The thing is that kind of solution only works on that kind of scale. If they get a false positive and ban someone that player can still play on other servers. If the developer gets a false positive and bans someone the player is shit out of luck…

        • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Fair point, just sounds like a reason to me why we should lobby for regulation that forces game developers to provide us with the software to host our own servers