Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform’s entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website “Bluesky Stats.” Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It’s impossible to know whether Musk’s comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Medium is a bad source but there’s truth that Bluesky’s CEO is a musk toesucker.

    • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastadon (and the Fediverse in general, to some extent) has problems with discoverability and the average user finds federation confusing. People tend to either use microblogging to see what’s going on with people they’re interested in or to broadcast their activities to a large group of people, and Mastadon currently doesn’t fit that niche very well.

      • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d bet mastodon saw an increase, but i haven’t seen the numbers.

        It’s also hard to get a good count since it’s not centralized. So whatever numbers we do see, could be wildly underreported.

    • PaulHulford@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Each current member usually get at least one invite to share biweekly. That’s how they have been growing it.

      • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gmail was invite only at first probably because Google didn’t want it to grow faster than they could buy hard drives. It gave you a gigabyte of email storage which at the time was huge. I’m certain they did that for technical reasons.

          • wjrii@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gmail was also both “federated” and an insanely good product compared to its contemporaries. G+ had a couple of interesting innovations, but it wasn’t all that special and invite-only on a closed ecosystem is very iffy.

            • GreenMario@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gmail was literally the best. 1GB space at launch when you’d get a dozen MB in Hotmail and others, slick fast UI in a browser.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are so desperate for anything RESEMBLING twitter, that they’ll sign up for a trash service like BS.

    Mastodon undoubtedly has more brand recognition at this point.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great another social media platform from the same fart huffing dumb asses that sold Twitter… it’s like people don’t learn lessons.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      FYI jack isn’t in control of the site and in fact even deleted his account after the userbase mocked him hard enough, he’s all in on nostr now

      Also it has federation in testing in a sandbox environment open to external developers, it will work similarly to Mastodon in that regard

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Mr Dorsey, ypur new platform is picking up, people are starting to use it”

        “… I’m bored”

        “Excuse me?”

        “I don’t want to have a social platform. I just want to make them” *Starts to leave*

        “Mr. dorsey? Where are you going? Jack!?”

      • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love that I mentioned fart huffing and you automatically assumed I meant Jack.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe they just don’t have the infra (and if they still don’t, I don’t believe they ever will). Turn off invites and make it open-season or shut the whole thing down. It’s not a competitor like this.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad cracker musk is losing money over this, I just wish people wouldn’t just jump into the next boiling pot because the current one got too hot.