• Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I do not understand how anyone uses mobile apps with ads. thats just so dystopian to me

    • Devmapall@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I was watching some TV with friend. Show on prime and on Hulu.

      Both had ads. Granted they were far less than actual television is but I do not miss ads at all. They really spoil the experience. Especially for a paid service.

  • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

    Robbing corporations is based, though, actually.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

      No. Find a way to make money that doesn’t require showing ads online if you have a problem with it.

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yeah. I don’t have a contract with the site, agreeing to pay them in any way, shape or form. They voluntarily show me their content, but that does not obligate me to also accept their ads.

  • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here’s why it’s okay to block ads in pretty simple terms:

    Ads can contain ransomware; that is to say, a seemingly innocent ad can deliver a payload which will run on your computer, lock your files, and demand you pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars anonymously.

    Now if you go to the website that served the ad and tell them, “I allowed ads on your site because I support your right to monetise your content, and now I have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, will you help me pay that” or “will you pay that for me since your site served the ransomware,” you know what they will tell you, every single time, without fail? Whether they actually answer you, or more likely, just delete your email. They’re telling you that it’s your problem. That you should have secured your computer better.

    So secure your computer better now. Block all the ads.

    Getting a little more technical, use Firefox or a fork of it. Use Linux if you can. Use a Mac if you can’t. If you really must use Windows, know how to secure it. I use Windows 11 at work, I’d never use it at home, but I had a talk with the IT guy, and he let me do a few things to it. I know more than he does, but he’s the one with the job, so I told him what I’d do before I did it, I did exactly what I said I was going to do, nothing more nothing less, and I still think my home computer is more secure, but I’m a lot less worried about using the work machine. I think it’s wild that so many companies just use Windows. I’m not trying to hate on Windows. It’s good for gaming and it’s accessible. I’d love to see more companies roll their own *nix or just use Macs (which run macOS which is UNIX certified).

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Advertising should be illegal. It should be considered harassment.

    If you want people to find your product then we need to log that in a public database site. If you want to find a product go there, nobody ever wants to find a product while driving or watching movies or existing in public.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      I agree, it’s just a net negative for the world.

      If nobody advertised, the world would be better off

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I have a personal rule to never buy from brands that harass me by spamming annoying ads left and right.

      • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I can’t believe people actually pay for branded clothing. I avoid branded clothing like the plague. If companies like Nike actually want someone to walk around plastered with their brand on them they should be paying them.

        But companies have convinced people to pay enormous amounts of money to wear their brand as a “style” or as “self-expression”. Just wow.

  • Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think all ads should be blocked. If billions in funding is going to be put to use it should go towards offsetting environmental impact and developing products that are actually better, instead of just convincing people to settle for a cute jingle

  • Teal@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’re unnecessary, distracting, some try to track you and others can have malware. No thanks.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Right? These companies act like they are selling food and we are stealing it.

      In reality, they put a big “free beer” sign up, we go and happily accept the beer, and then they act outraged that we refuse when they try to piss in the mug after handing it to us.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s my computer isn’t it? I can discard packets I don’t care to receive

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    It would be much harder to block ads if they were more like newspapers and just a part of the page you were viewing, instead of imported from a different source.

    But in order to do that the site themselves would be responsible for the ads they display instead of blaming their ad service, and they would lose out on all their tracking data.

    So fuck em.

  • xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    “It’s my ccomputer” has already been mentioned, but it’s my bandwidth and my home network too. Ads can stay off it.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      there were so many fucking ads online in the late 90s

      and you couldn’t block them because they were either served from the same domain or used the same plugin as the content and it was an all-or-nothing thing

      all those goddamn blinking gifs with “click here” and “you’re our millionth visitor”, and the pop-ups, and the flash bars with “shoot the ducks”…

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          yeah, but as soon as the web actually had enough traffic to take off the ads were everywhere. before 1996 it was basically just a prototype.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          considering that “web 2.0” is widely accepted to be “the social web”, where the focus was on user contribution and interoperability… no.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      There were ads! But these were simple banner graphics of 468x60 pixels. In the worst case it was an animated GIF. But hosted on the same server as the page and without any tracking shenanigans.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going “Hey You!”. With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.

        Every so often one gets through my blocker and they have only gotten more annoying.

        • jawa21@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, people seem to have mostly forgotten about the forced audio playback that was really prevalent for a while. It was crazy effective because you would have to hint down the actual ad causing the issue on the page to stop it.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going “Hey You!”. With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.

          I have a similar story. People were fine with ads until they got too obnoxious and intrusive, and now the people making the obnoxious intrusive ads are crying that people are blocking them.

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        LoL, that wasn’t the original internet. That was years after the internet had been around. <joke here about these kids needing to get off my lawn>