• Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    When the Snowden Revelations came out, it turned out the UK did as much or maybe even more civil society surveillance as the US, and unlike the US it doesn’t even have constitutional limitations on surveillance of people on their own soil (in fact the UK doesn’t even have a written Constitution).

    In the US they actually walked back on some of the surveillance (because of said constitutional protections), in the UK they just passed a law that retroactively made the whole thing legal, got the editor of the newspaper who brought out the Snowden Revelations kicked, fired a bunch of D-Notices around (the UK’s Press Censorship mechanism) out and nobody ever talked about it again.

    As soon as the technology was good enough for that the UK created a Digital Stasi and it’s only gotten worse since.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      and unlike the US it doesn’t even have constitutional limitations on surveillance of people on their own soil

      • I’d argue the US doesn’t anymore either, or if it does, it’s only on paper. Shit, rights in general in the US are to the degree where they only exist on paper anymore, and I can think of some fascists that would get rid of the Constitution altogether and implement absolute, unbreakable rule if they could… Trump…