For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline” (with regard to advertising, kinda-sorta)

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Maybe just a liittle cancer until we get smartphones and then we can nip it in the bud and ooops why is everyone mad oh no why are all the animals dying I just wanted to scroll for gods sake

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Came out of government-funded research actually. Back when we could still achieve scientific feats on behalf of our country.

        • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          It was private at that time. My point is that it spread so quickly to millions of people worldwide because of capitalists specifically the telecom companies and ISPs stepping in. Without them, the internet could never have developed on such a scale.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 hours ago

            No it wasn’t

            First connections were between universities. Tim Berners-Lee at CERN then came up with web pages to easier share information

            There was nothing capitalist about the internet back then

          • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The telecom companies got paid by the government to do it, they just as easily could have paid themselves to do it but we as a society are allergic to the idea of taking money out of the hands of poor billionaires and their potential profits

            • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That doesn’t undermine my argument that it was ultimately because of the capitalists that the internet spread in the first place.

              • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It does undermine your argument though, because you are saying that it only spread because of capitalists. I’m telling you it spread because of government funding and capitalists were just the medium by which the funding was used. The capitalist part is replaceable and unnecessary.

                • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  33 minutes ago

                  I’m telling you it spread because of government funding and capitalists were just the medium by which the funding was used.

                  It doesn’t work just by you saying it. According to multiple sources, the government clearly didn’t want to fund commercial internet and largely backed out during the 90s.

                  The capitalist part is replaceable and unnecessary.

                  It doesn’t matter if you think it’s replaceable, I can make that claim too. What matters is what actually happened in reality.

          • despicable@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            And how would you know without the internet being developed under a different system at the time?

            • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s not an argument. I don’t need to speculate on hypotheticals when reality already proves the point.

              • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                You are speculating on hypotheticals though, since no one can know for certain how things would have unfolded in a different world.

                I’m not even going to argue that capitalism doesn’t get you some positive outcomes for certain people.

              • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The internet would not have existed without government investment. Back when the idea of the internet was being floated around in the early 1960s the US government did contact every major telecom company in the country snd all flat out refused meaning the government had to publically foot the bill (and the work).

                No, capitalists would never, ever have invented the internet.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We got internet thanks to scientists and engineers. No amount of capitalists, politicians, managers or business people can create an internet. They say ‘here’s some money to make stuff’ and that’s the limit of their involvement.