This is literally just the r/nyt subreddit about The New York Times.

Given he apparently takes inspiration from Elon Musk, it’s only a matter of time until u/spez starts adding post view limits unless you pay extra.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you install the duckduckgo browser and turn on app tracking protection, you’ll see just how much data is harvested from mobile apps, which is genuinely scary.

    This is why these sites are pushing the mobile app. It’s much harder to prevent trackers through an app than it is through a web browser.

    • Tot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just installed this and am trying the app tracking protection (it’s in beta, for those reading who haven’t used it). Shockingly, Candy Crush Soda doesn’t come up with a list of junk being tracked. whew or something

      Here’s a screenshot from Discord:

      • Vahtos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some of that seems unnecessary (device boot time). But it’s not all scary spooky tracking. Some permissions/information is required for certain features.

        For example, you can’t rotate your app UI if you’re not allowed to know screen orientation. Or maybe they do a low power mode if device battery is low, or a warning that the app might not function well if the OS or device is old.

        Not saying you’re wrong or that Discord is right. Just pointing out that a long list of permissions isn’t on its own a bad thing, if those permissions are required for specific features, and not just for the sake of data harvesting.

        • Metallibus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of these are just standard things that things like crash reporters pull. In other words, Discord probably included a crash reporter in their app, and it pulls things like memory usage, device state, os version, what orientation the device is in, etc so that when a crash happen, it can tag those to the developers. Those are all useful variables to the developers to understand what is causing the crash.

          Tons of apps use crash reporters to keep their app stable. I’m sure most apps will pull the vast majority of this information. That doesn’t mean that they’re using it to track you.

        • Funwayguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why though I appreciate what DDG is doing, it’s not informing users about the context of what these permissions are used for, leading to a lot of fear over the wrong things. The data may not even be leaving the device but the implication DDG makes is that it is.

          As a side note, I prefer to use DNS66 to filter data and ads by domain, then manually set my Android app permissions as needed.

          • Metallibus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is one hundred percent sensationalism. Just because the app pulls it doesn’t mean that it’s being used to track you down. It’s probably just for crash reporting etc.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why the weekend DDoS attacks and frontpage vandalism don’t really concern me. With spez and Musk burning their services to the ground, we’re (along with other competitors, we’re not the only one) going to get a steady influx pressure for the coming months or even years. Shutting us partly down for a few hours every weekend does nothing in the face of this much stronger phenomenon. Whoever is doing it is basically pissing into the wind.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kinda good since devs getting their systems stress tests while service is still young and alpha testers don’t bitch about minor inconvience unlike Normie’s stream…

      This FrEe SerVIcE MusT JUst WurK, Rheee

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. This is very uncomfortable for us, but we’re going to come out much stronger for it.

        Imagine the alternative–the devs just skipping through imaginary meadows, adding pleasant little features and taking their time, while the userbase grew and grew, and then we experienced a very major breach of trust and security.

        That could’ve theoretically killed us. Now it won’t happen. Everyone is staring at their code and thinking “yep, security is important, that’s true…”

  • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Libreddit and Teddit may be dead, but Kddit still works. Eddrit also does the trick, but occasionally gets overloaded.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s just trying to protect people from inappropriate content. We all know how harmful inappropriate content can be for children unless it’s paired with targeted advertisements, which mitigate the danger.

  • qwed113@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish there was a way to accelerate widespread adoption of Lemmy.

    Reddit has been awesome, but the community deserves a decentralized platform free from bullshit like this.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably for the benefit of Lemmy that the grow is slow, it gives the servers plenty of time to upgrade. It’s already been struggling somewhat with the influx of new users, it may have become totally unusable with 100x, 1000x the user’s etc.

      Be patient.

  • hoodatninja@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehhhh. This could just be their current stopgap because of all of the NSFW swaps happening. I think you are extrapolating too much.

    Don’t get me wrong, I could totally see Reddit enacting this policy in their “infinite wisdom” and quietly rolling it out. But you are drawing too much from this screenshot. We need more context.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh there’s no doubt they’ve slowly made it more of a pain in the ass to not use the app (while also making the app worse) but this specific screenshot is too much missing context for OP’s claim to be assumed. It could be true but we don’t know enough.

        • net00@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do remember seeing this popup way before the whole API & protests debacle. The warning doesn’t even make sense, how will switching to the app to see the same content be safer?

          I figured you needed to login (to apply your block list, filters, NSFW prefs, etc), but merely seeing the desktop mode of the website lets you through (not even using old.reddit). So this is another cheap way of forcing you to their cancer app.

          Now you can’t even SORT comments without using the app. They are really taking all pqges off Elon’s book on ruining a website.

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That was specifically for NSFW subs. What OP is showing us is not an NSFW sub. Hence the post.

            I do not know why people think I tacitly approve of these changes. I do not. But what OP is claiming may or may not be true. We do not have enough information. It’s a completely separate matter from whether or not I think Reddit has been trying to funnel people towards their app, which clearly they have been for quite some time.