8GB RAM in M3 MacBook Pro Proves the Bottleneck in Real-World Tests::Apple’s new MacBook Pro models are powered by cutting-edge M3 Apple silicon, but the base configuration 14-inch model starting at $1,599…

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      165
      ·
      1 year ago

      8 gigs of ram for some shitty laptop is fine. Like the air shipping with 8 gigs of ram is fine (not great, but fine)

      But for a “Pro” machine, let alone a 1600 dollar computer is insane.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        MacBook Air is a $1000 computer too though :/ I bought a Thinkpad t480s with 8gb of (upgradable) ram for less than that back in 2019. currently running it with 24gb.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even Lenovo is starting to drop upgradable ram from their machines. T480 was the last T*4 series with dual upgradeable ram slots. T490 and up all have at least 1 soldered stick, and the AMD machines now don’t come with any upgradeable ram. Their prices to upgrade are at least reasonable unlike Apples.

          Shit I got a T16 gen 3(?) for my mom a few months ago and it came with only 8 gigs of soldered ram. That machine is even worse than Apple because AMD locks away 1.5 gigs of ram for just the APU. Intel at least only hard reserves like 256MB or something. Apple gives you the full 8 gigs of ram to play with, no duplicates in CPU memory and GPU memory, plus their really fast swap.

          • Sentau@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            AMD locks away 1.5 gigs of ram for just the APU

            You can change this allocation from the BIOS if you are so inclined. Not that it makes it any better. Sharing 8 gigs between cpu and iGPU is only acceptable when you are doing nothing but web browsing on the laptop/pc

              • Sentau@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hmm must be that different manufacturers allow for different allocations. I am on an MSI laptop and I have the options of Auto, 256M, 512M, 768M and 1024M

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lenovo isn’t exactly a consumer friendly company themselves. Weren’t they the ones with the hardware set up to reinstall their preinstalled spyware if you removed it?

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My kid grabbed an 8/256 M2 Air when they first launched last year, and is still overjoyed with its performance. He has a PS5 for gaming, so the Mac is for uni work and downloading shit. 8gb RAM isn’t inherently bad.

        It’s just as you said though; it’s bad for a “Pro” machine.

          • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair. But he likes using it and there’s more to value than the monetary cost of a device. For a start, there’s the build quality, but also the integration with his iPhone.

          • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man, you should watch new series of Planet Earth then, because there are some significantly more astounding things on that than someone spending their own money on a computer they wanted.

            • laxmanndhotre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              No thanks. People making dumb financial decisions will be always more astounding.

              Maybe because I didn’t grow in rich family but okay carry on, I wasn’t judging. It was genuinely fascinating to me

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is someone likely to use a shitty laptop for? Open a web browser to run ~1080p video?

        • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a Chromebook that I put Linux onto. It’s got a Celeron and 4gb ram. It’s fine for web browsing email, etc on the go. It can play a ton of older games just fine, too; half-life 2 and episodes run surprisingly well. Minecraft with sodium and all settings turned down works okay, too.

        • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          My exeperience is lot of people just want an ipad they can type on. The m2 air is basically the same size and weight as an ipad pro, and the screen is more protected if you carry it in a backpack. It’s also probably cheaper, especially if you want any of the accessories that make it “pro” ipad.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe you’re not supposed to do any pro stuff with it. Just watch youtube videos and browse FB or whatever it is that grandmas do these days. Many apple products don’t really feel as pro as you’re lead to believe by the marketing team.

        Just today I ran into a strange issue with the iMovie on iOS. You literally can’t edit a vertical video in any sensible way. Either you shoot horizontal video or you don’t shoot at all. These are the only options Apple gives for you.

        • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t use iMovie for 1:1 video either. You have to edit clips with fat borders at the edges, then export it to Photos in order to crop it square. It’s such a weird thing to miss out.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using an 8GB laptop for a few years now and don’t feel the need to have more. But if I’m paying that much I’d expect at least 16GB.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s my problem with the 8GB. I even have the Air with that much memory. It’s fine… but I also got it secondhand. For new, I can’t pay that much money for entry level RAM specs.

      • PeachMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I have 8GB of RAM on my Macbook Air and it works fine, I just need to manage my browser tabs and restart Chrome sometimes. But if I was paying $1600 or more for a “Pro” laptop…the fuck?

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My company computer had 4 GBs of RAM… And an HDD with Windows 11, the worst fucking experience.

          • scottywh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well neither is my surface pro 4 but I don’t want 11 and that machine still works great anyway.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That was the weird thing as well, only my PC was eligible for an upgrade lol.

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s so you can write 1000GB on it and have be cheaper than a 256GB machine. My folks had a 2019 laptop with an HDD, I’m not even being figurative here, they literally could not use it, 10+ minutes to boot it and load a program. Constant 100% I/O usage. Stuck some RAM and and a SATA SSD in it, it’s been a daily driver ever since.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I open the two essential Excel tools that we use all day + teams and outlook and I’m at 10gb of memory usage…

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I know, 4 GBs was a fucking nightmare back in the days when I did my colleague homework in 2014… It is even worse now.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      No doubt. Even wilder to me is the idea of buying a Mac with 8GB in 2023, speaking as a long time Mac owner. Mine is from several years ago. I wonder if Apple execs ever pull their heads out of their asses. This feels like the late 90s all over again.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bought a Dell 6core AMD laptop on some sale and it was little 345 after tax and shipping. Then I immediately replaced the nvme with a 1tb one for another 70? I think. Laptop is really nice for the price.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same with NVIDIA, who are stubbornly refusing to give their overpriced GPUs the VRAM they deserve.

      • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t they also solder it to the motherboard so you can’t upgrade your RAM as well?

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          51
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not so much soldered to the motherboard as much as part of the same package as the CPU. As in: there are no separate memory chips.

          • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But they did indeed solder it in before that, on their old Intel laptops. I think they started doing that in 2013 or 2014 but I forget exactly.

            • 4am@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That has more to do with faster traces; the ram is “closer” to the CPU so the signal is cleaner.

              Not defending the move, I’d take upgradability in a laptop.

              • TwanHE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Only makes a difference at oc levels of manual tuning. Which apple isn’t doing at their factory I reckon.

                • 4am@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, when you’re the one manufacturing the board, I’m pretty sure you could eek out some more baseline performance without having to tweak each one for OC in the production line, my dude.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So wait- if you want to increase your RAM, you have to install a whole new CPU?

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, the ram is part of the m3 chip That’s a reason why it is so efficient. The storage in m3 is for RAM and videoRAM.

          Wikipedia: The M3’s Unified Memory Architecture features up to 24 GB RAM, the M3 Pro up to 36 GB, and the M3 Max up to 128 GB. Like the M2 generation, the M3 SoCs use 6,400 MT/s LPDDR5 SDRAM. As with prior M series SoCs, this serves as both RAM and video RAM.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s literally how Intel integrated GPUs work too

            The RAM being shared with the GPU, that is.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea but the RAM is not on the located within the chip design, is it?

            • DarienGS@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              With Apple’s chips the RAM is all on the CPU die so both CPU and GPU get the performance benefit. With Intel’s, none of it is.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                "What Apple calls “unified memory” is RAM (random-access memory) used as “main memory” (not a CPU or GPU cache and not mass storage either).

                The term “unified” refers to the fact that the memory is shared by the CPU cores and the GPU cores. That’s not novel: “integrated graphics” options in Intel x86 chips (like Iris Xe) do the same, as do just about all modern smartphones."

                • DarienGS@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not talking about the merits or otherwise of “unified memory”, I’m pointing out that because Apple’s RAM is physically integrated into the CPU, it can provide more memory bandwidth than regular DDR5 DIMMs.

        • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yeah, if you were paying $50 a GB wouldn’t you too? Got to lock that shit down!

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        How the fuck did Apple manage to be the largest company on the planet doing shit like this? Are Apple users really that fucking dumb?

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And they’re much better at marketing than they are at making computers or phones. Apple is probably the most successful marketing company in the world.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure “friendly” is quite the right word… you can argue it’s well designed or cultivated users but Apple is anything but a "friend"ly.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Their UI and UX is shit. You basically can’t use it for many basic tasks without installing a bunch of third party (proprietary and expensive) software.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple loves under ramming (to give a word a new meaning) and forcing everyone to pay for upgrades. The problem is there are always people that buy the base.

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the point is to squeeze out a couple extra hundred dollars from customers.

        Apple has long done price anchoring with their products just like in this case.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point I’m pretty sure the ram costs more than the rest of the laptop.

    • DarienGS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple’s RAM isn’t as cheap as you might think, because it’s all built directly onto the CPU die. That’s part of what makes its computers so fast.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The people to whom this discussion ought to matter (the prospective buyers of an 8GB RAM machine) are utterly oblivious to this discussion. They’ll continue to walk into an Apple Store and buy these machines. We are like body builders arguing about how obese people should stop eating shit.

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah it’s cool, you can just open the little door in the back and upgrade the RAM anytime you want.

    Right??

    • NotSoCoolWhip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sir, this is apple.

      Gotta buy their apple 5 point screwdriver

      Open back

      Remove adhesive & battery

      Dismount motherboard and keyboard

      Find out it’s soldered ram

      Kill self

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      With a hot air rework station anything is upgradable, laptops, phones, babies… ok not babies, but like lots of other stuff.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, in the future, lamps will be permanently wired into house walls. Who even needs outlets? Just buy a new house if you don’t like the lamp anymore.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I get OP’s joke, but “permanent” doesn’t really apply to anything about houses. “Wired into wall” just means you need a screwdriver and a circuit breaker flip to change it, or maybe cutting into wall panels.

        • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean it doesn’t matter if the house around the wiring falls apart first. Most modern construction is like one step above paper mache.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s Apple so they probably do some kind of bullshit key pairing nonsense to prevent you being able to upgrade the RAM even with the soldering iron.

        I really wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not actually possible

        • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh it’s not even close to being user-upgradeable. As in, the RAM module is part of the silicon M3 chipset. You can’t upgrade it because it is literally part of the CPU die.

          Of course, apple could address this by also offering expansion slots that users can install ram in, but that would mean being nice to consumers, which we all know apple is fundamentally opposed to.

  • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s hard to take the Mac seriously. This is even more dumbfounding because they have an excellent processor. Then they pair it with anemic RAM and make demonstrably false statements about the system’s performance. I don’t get it.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      soldering in an unusably low amount of memory or storage into the base model is classic bait and switch. they get to advertise a much lower price than what you will end up paying

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if people buy the low-end one, they’ll feel like they need to upgrade sooner.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If that was really a danger for them, the original iMac would have killed the company. At least it had a nice colourful case to look at while waiting for it to do things or restart after its latest crash.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My four year old phone has more RAM than an expensive macbook? LMFAO 🤭🤭🤭

    • Darken@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Um actthually mac is so oPtimized so 1gb mac = 12.3gb windows 🤓

      STFU it physically has less ram than a potato while costing the price of a nasa rocket

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also Apple™ RAM costs like 4 to 8 times as much. Being $200 for 8GB. So assuming fantasy land Apple™ iMagic™ means 8GB = 16GB it’s still a minimum of twice the cost per dollar

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apple ram actually is just more dense. They can fit more binary in each gigabyte.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, so a tech neophyte here so please dont crucify me. Would that not be adding more transistors to the ram? And, would that not affect clock speed?

            • sergih@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              an explanation of the joke :D, he is saying more binary in a gigabyte, I get what u mean with the transistors but he aint talking about that, he talks about being able to fit more data (binary, the raw data, ones and zeroes) in the same space (one gigabyte, like 1024^9 or around 1billions spaces for the ones and zerors) bc ofc, it’s apple so they somehow can save morr info in the same amount of space, that’s whatvhe meant :)

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks for the clarification! I appreciate it. I guess I was equating the binary, ones and zeroes, to the transistor gates either been on or off. Again, thank you!

        • sergih@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          and if u spend another 200 it goes from 16 to 32, so apparrntly somehow 8gb can cost 200 or 100 bc apple

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who mentioned Windows??

        Did you watch the video? The 8GB model is like 1/4 the speed of the 16GB model.

        It’s a bottleneck, clear as day. I just thought it was funny that Apple is so stingy that they’d even consider putting an offensive 8GB of ram on this laptop.

        • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Apple did https://www.macrumors.com/2023/11/08/8gb-ram-m3-macbook-pro-like-16-gb-pc/

          It’s not directly mentioned in this conversation, but the excuse as to why they put such a pathetic amount of RAM in the laptop is that “Macs use it more efficiently”

          edit: The quote is “Actually, 8GB on an M3 MacBook Pro is probably analogous to 16GB on other systems. We just happen to be able to use it much more efficiently.”

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Apple being apple… marketing at it’s worst.

            Sure, it’s “more efficient” than other operating systems if you want to look at how much space is being utilized, but other operating systems don’t seem to have the same catastrophic performance bottlenecks as this apple laptop apparently does.

            The fact that going from 8gb to 16gb improves system performance by 4-5x is something you’d never see happen in a “less efficient” operating system, so what’s Apple’s excuse for using it?

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Apple had to know these reviews were coming. A new iteration on their custom SOC is obviously going to make every tech site go bananas benchmarking and their claim that 8GB = 16GB is going to make them punish the machine even harder.

    It’s like they decided a few bad reviews would cost them less than cutting their markup on RAM to make a 16GB entry level Pro machine for less than $2k.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s worse is that their “8GB = 16GB” claim has a tiny bit of truth in it: many apps that are GPU-accelerated usually load/generate stuff on host RAM and then transfer it to the GPU RAM to launch some shaders/kernels on it and they do this repeatedly. The idea with Apple (also AMD when you consider APUs) is that since the RAM is “unified” you just have one RAM and you probably don’t have that redundancy anymore if those apps are built with that in mind, so in a sense if previously you had a 1GB buffer that had to live on both CPU and GPU RAM, this time it will only live in as a single 1GB buffer on Apple’s “unified” RAM. That’s still very different from the “8GB = 16GB” deceptive marketing by Apple.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      The worst part is that in many retail chains like Costco, you can only get the 8GB version. I suspect the review reading segment of the population is smaller than we’d expect for such an expensive purchase. Previously they’ve crippled M1 machines that have 256Gb storage, only including one controller instead of two as in the 512+ machines. It’s a shame for MacBook Air, but totally unacceptable for a computer marketed as “Pro”

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With all the ports a pro needs, right. Right? 😅

        I tell you what, i do love my lenovo x1 carbon. I used to have a real macbook pro from back in the day. Loved it. Upgradable, ports everywhere. Fast. Beautiful.

        I had to move to Linux and a machine like the lenovo as i was not going to put up with 1 port and a fuck you very much.

        However, they also have soldered in parts now, so next machine will be something else.

  • Tom_bishop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    With that kind of memory swapping, the soldered ssd gonna be toasts within 1 or 2 yrs. Its already a known problem in previous macbooks, where people runs memory intensive programs and find thier mac book dead after even 6 months to 1 yr

      • Tom_bishop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what i read the previous cases it uses the ssd. Thus the ssd write cycle maxed out after 6 months leaving the mac dead. And then Apple sent a replacement, the guy use it as he usually did, and in 6months dead again.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure it just doesn’t do anything. I’m not going to get one and test it because I’m not insane but from the performance specs of people are putting out it looks like it just maxes out the ram and then does nothing.

        I was saying this when the M2 was first announced. It’s impressive for what it is, but what it is, is actually kind of crap.

        • orangeboats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “it just maxes out the ram and then does nothing.” is absolute nonsense. The programs need memory to operate.

          If your RAM is maxed out and the programs seem to operate just as fine, the OS is doing something behind the scenes, it’s just a matter of what that something is. And memory swapping / virtual memory is a well-known method of alleviating RAM overuse, at the cost of murdering your SSD/HDD lifespan.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. It’s purely academic to me, as I have no intention of buying any Apple products or any desktop not assembled myself.
          2. interesting how I asked an honest question and am being downvoted without further comment. Have the Steve Jobs fuckbois already infested the fediverse?
    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think selling an 8GB laptop with a Pro moniker is a terrible move. But you’ll need to cite examples (more than one, because sometimes components just fail under the best of circumstances).

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And then wonder why Mac sales tanked 27% in their last financial report. Selling 8Gb laptops is an offence.

    And seriously for their price, I would much prefer a laptop like Framework that I know I can easily swap components and make it workable even after a while.

    • sviper@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple is the proof Marketting >> Quality.

      They sell the premium dream making the user think it’s the best.

    • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      100 percent in agreement that apples ram pricing is lunacy

      But my brother. Wtf do you need that much ram in a phone for lol. Mine has 6gb (12 pro lmao) and that causes me zero issues. Granted, I don’t game on my phone. But is phone gaming really eating that much ram these days?

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I also have 12 GB. There are usage patterns where additional RAM wull be useful or even necessary on a phone. When you have more RAM, the phone can sleep tasks and leave background apps alone without having to discard their contents from RAM. This means fewer cold startups. Also, more contents can be cached, which means faster app startups. Both of these techniques also reduce CPU usage and improve battery life. You can also achieve more tabs in your browsers and more and bigger apps running at the same time. More RAM also means fewer situations where swapping is done or needed, so additional CPU and disk cycles are saved and battery usage is reduced. Some apps will actually require more RAM or spin more when memory is scarce. Examples can be advanced content creation apps in audio, video, or picture/photography. Also, some games, especially in high settings.

        Are these additional GBs necessary? No. And most people would not notice them, as even 6 GB is overkill for quite a number of peoples’ usage patterns. Your phone does maybe 95% of what it does just about as well, even when you have a low-midrange CPU and GPU that is from a few years ago, and just 4 or 6gb of RAM.

        This holds true for iOS and Android. They’ve both done a fair bit of housekeeping and software improvements to reel in excessive resource usage gen over gen. I think Android was doing some catch-up here for a while, but I don’t know how they go toe to toe on this anymore, and it’s difficult to empirically compare the two in this area.