• aard@kyu.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    There were some rumours that he was pushing the commercial side too fast, potentially ignoring ethical issues. Given Altmans lobbying against AI regulation in the EU I find that plausible.

    Since now apparently the investors won it proves that the special structure of for-profit owned by non-profit intended to keep them honest does not work - and we urgently need to have regulation in place, as self-regulation does not work.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “Private investor” in this case is Microsoft, which “graciously” offered to bring all the staff into their own new AI project. This is 100% an investor (a.k.a microsoft) win.

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard to tell from the outside - but at the beginning it mainly looked like pressure from the investors. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’d been a lot of activity from them behind the scenes, and the “90% leaving” part wasn’t really “standing up for Altman”, but more “follow the money”, with investors possibly pressuring employees in various ways.