cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWhats your such opiniondiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square1339fedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down188
arrow-up1534arrow-down1imageWhats your such opiniondiscuss.tchncs.decryptix@discuss.tchncs.de to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square1339fedilink
minus-squareEuroNutellaMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, 2+2 = 🐟 so it would be 8÷2🐟 and since 🐟 is no longer a number it becomes 4🐟. So the answer is 4 fishes.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-29 months ago since 🐟 is no longer a number It’s still a pronumeral though, equal to 4, so the answer is still 8÷8=1.
No, 2+2 = 🐟 so it would be 8÷2🐟 and since 🐟 is no longer a number it becomes 4🐟. So the answer is 4 fishes.
It’s still a pronumeral though, equal to 4, so the answer is still 8÷8=1.