Yeah, I kind of agree here. I think we should have a “playoff” system where candidates could pick a party for advertising purposes, but otherwise compete on an open playing field with all other candidates.
Here’s how I’d like it to work:
ban all political ads, outside of informing when the next debate or rally will happen
all debates are funded with tax-payer dollars
for House seats, vote by party for the general election, and Reps would be elected proportionally and based on primary votes
Senate seats work as they currently do, except for the voting system change below
all votes are some kind of IRV system, e.g. ranked choice, approval, etc
there would be a vote after each primary debate (should have 3-5 of those), and if you don’t participate, your previous votes carry forward through the primary process; candidates are eliminated if they go under some threshold; you could straight-ticket this, but it would weight all candidates from your party equally
This probably needs to be refined, but I think the general approach is worth discussing.
Yeah, I kind of agree here. I think we should have a “playoff” system where candidates could pick a party for advertising purposes, but otherwise compete on an open playing field with all other candidates.
Here’s how I’d like it to work:
This probably needs to be refined, but I think the general approach is worth discussing.
Nice, you got the ranked choice in there!
“Establishment hates this one simple trick!”
Lol. Ranked choice isn’t my first pick, but I think it’s an improvement. I’d prefer a bigger change than just the vote counting system though.