• Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would the instance maintainers have to deal with it if the norm is that the users block the individuals and instances they want no part of? You see shitty content - block the source, either the user or instance. There could be a feature where an instance blocks something if a certain percentage of its users block it.

      • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        the norm is that the users block the individuals and instances they want no part of?

        “Yeah, just block every bigot in existance and you will achieve a somewhat good experience”

        Spammers also exist, and they can go long ways to avoid blocking by e.g. creating many accounts. There are people out there who could do this just to troll and harass a single user. If you’re fine with blocking every piece of shit there are - good for you. But it doesn’t mean it should be a norm.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t rocket science. First, let instance maintainers handle bigots, spammers etc. on their own instance. If you still find that instance contributing with too much crap in your feed - block those users or the entire instance. I’ve blocked several accounts and a couple of instances. It’s very easy to do.

          And again, there could be a number of tools and features created to help users block stuff. Use your imagination. A user with an orange warning triangle is harassing you? Well that triangle means that user is in one or more block lists for problematic behavior - do you want to use any of those block lists? Click a button. Or whatever. Just let the users decide and prevent instances from creating a cascading instance-blocking that puts the fediverse at risk.