• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not significantly more expensive though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

    I’m looking at that source it shows:

    • nuclear $6,695-7,547 /kw
    • solar pv $1,327 /kw

    At the most generous calculation (of nuclear costly only $6,695) that puts nuclear power at 5 x more expensive that solar PV. So if you have a theoretical pure electricity bill on solar PV of $100/month, your theoretical pure electricity bill on nuclear of $500/month.

    I’m not sure how you reach the conclusion that nuclear is not significantly more expensive.

    • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

      Different methods of electricity generation can incur a variety of different costs, which can be divided into three general categories: 1) wholesale costs, or all costs paid by utilities associated with acquiring and distributing electricity to consumers, 2) retail costs paid by consumers, and 3) external costs, or externalities, imposed on society. Wholesale costs include initial capital, operations & maintenance (O&M), transmission, and costs of decommissioning. Depending on the local regulatory environment, some or all wholesale costs may be passed through to consumers. These are costs per unit of energy, typically represented as dollars/megawatt hour (wholesale). The calculations also assist governments in making decisions regarding energy policy. On average the levelized cost of electricity from utility scale solar power and onshore wind power is less than from coal and gas-fired power stations,: TS-25  but this varies a lot depending on location.: 665

      article | about