I’ve installed arch Linux and liked it, but lfs and Gentoo would be too time consuming compiling everything and not doing anything during and after install. Are there any distros like arch that don’t have me compiling everything?

  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    NixOS or GNU Guix are your best options for advanced distributions. Guix is a much newer project so theres a lot of ways you can contribute.

  • philluminati@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A linux distro is a linux distro. It’s you, who invests the time to experiment and understand, who unlocks advanced features. There’s no shortcuts to learning Linux than to use it and read about it and install it many many times.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. You can use Ubuntu in a noobish way, or you can do crazy things with it. It’s not the tools, but the craftsman that makes the difference.

      That said, distros each have a niche, so find the one that’s closest to the types of problems you want to solve. For example, if you’re making a kiosk, you’re probably better off pushing out your own images, so a distro that’s designed to build small images is probably desired over one that seeks to pack in every library and application under the sun.

      If you don’t know what you want, pick something well supported and dig in to whatever interests you. Want to learn systemd? Pick a distro that uses it and write your own service files (e.g. maybe a Minecraft server, or perhaps synching). Want to learn to build software yourself? Grab a tarball from the project’s page instead of installing through the package manager. And so on. If you start from something unfamiliar, you’ll have to learn a lot of irrelevant things, which may not be what you want.

  • 667@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you at least tried to install Gentoo? Everyone has to think they can, and fail, at least once in their lives.

  • Glome@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Similar to arch in what way? What about arch don’t you like, you can look at other arch-based distros.

    Most distributions have binary package managers anyways, so you won’t struggle to find some.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. If it is the rolling nature op does actualy like perhaps opensuse tumblweed is a good one to try?

    • wtry@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t anything about arch I specifically don’t like, I’d just like to see if there’s anything that’s better in a certain criteria I don’t yet know of.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are lots of good distros. The question is a bit too vague for useful answers.

      • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could always try NixOS.

        Arch may not be particularly easy to use, but it’s a simple system, in that you can build a mental model of your entire setup with a fraction of the effort and time that you’d need to expend with other systems. It gives you the standard Linux experience without fuss, or handholding.

        Nix, however, gives you several capabilities that other systems won’t, but you’re paying for that through its learning curve.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    My personal journey was Arch > Void > Gentoo > Arch > Nix > Void again > realizing there’s nothing really like Arch and going back for good. Hope this helps!

  • s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean? Arch doesn’t have you “compiling everything”. It’s a mostly binary distribution. The Arch repositories are binary, and more than a few of the packages in the AUR are binary as well.

    I’m also not following “not doing anything during and after install” - what do you mean by after install in that sentence?

    I’d love to help, but I can’t figure out what your issue is. If you’re looking for something like Arch, but faster and easier to set up, try Endeavor - it’s basically Arch with a graphical installer and some neat extra tools.

    I’d also suggest looking in to Void, since you don’t appear to be afraid of the command line. You’ll find it similar in approach to Arch, but everything is binary packages; there’s no compiling unless you grab dev tools and pull the source from Github or Codeberg or whatever yourself.

    • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m also not following “not doing anything during and after install” - what do you mean by after install in that sentence?

      I made the mistake of trying to pacman -S librewolf not realizing it was going to compile from source. An hour later (on my Ryzen 7 5800X) it wasn’t finished, so I killed it and installed librewolf-bin.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        librewolf is not an official arch package it is in AUR. So you couldn’t have just typed pacman -S librewolf to compile it; and if you really wanted it without compiling libreworlf-bin.

  • jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the purpose? Which application do you have running on Linux that you think you need to compile everything, configure everything, and that will only run on an “advanced” distro?

    Is it some high specialized clustered distributed high performance, high availability computing application where you need your own kernel tweaks in?

    Or are you just a distro hopper, tinkering just for the sake of it and for imaginary bragging rights? If it’s for learning, try to establish a specific real goal and learn how to reach it.

  • 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean by “not doing anything during and after install” re Gentoo?

    Your computer isn’t held hostage during compilation of that was your impression

  • Secret300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    NixOS! I can’t for the life of me figure this shit out. It just won’t click for me but I get the advantages so I wanna use it so bad

  • sjmulder@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like Void, it feels a little more like a BSD. But I’ve only really used it for experimentation, no idea what it’s like as a daily driver.

    You could also try an actual BSD. OpenBSD has a very clear style and direction which I like but be careful when partitioning, they have their own ‘disklabel’ system. Updates are really streamlined with syspatch and sysupgrade.

    NetBSD had a nice TUI installer. It may appear a bit less focussed on its aims but has a lot going for it: many supporter platforms, a friendly community, etc.

    There’s also FreeBSD, DragonflyBSD, possibly more but I don’t have much experience with those.

  • mackwinston@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean by “advanced Linux distro”?

    If you mean starting at a minimal starting point and only installing what you need, then you may as well start off with a minimal Debian netinst, then add the stuff you want once you’ve got the minimal system installed.

    • yum13241@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP is probably complaining about AUR packages needing to be compiled most of the time. In that case, use the chaotic AUR. If you don’t trust it, then compile the software from the AUR yourself.

        • yum13241@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would a wrapper around pacman need documentation? Anyways, --help and the Arch Wiki have it too.

      • choroalp@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It takes like 10 seconds to install a package. Get benefits of Source based distros while still being fast af + No dependency hell

          • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, or if you override something you’ll compile that thing and anything depending on it. If you override glibc, you’ll recompile pretty much the entire system!

            • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              true, --substitute false will compile all dependencies, down to the compiler itself, but a simple (/s)

              nix-build "  " [package] --check
              

              will compile just the chosen package, skipping dependencies, and compare it against the cached binary in the repo to ensure they’re equivalent.

              I could have gotten that nix-build command slightly off as I’m typing this from memory. I am also saying most of this in jest as they aren’t really solutions to anything mentioned above and I moreso find them interesting features.

  • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    not doing anything during and after install

    You know that those of us who use Gentoo as a daily driver don’t just stare there and watch things compile, right?

    Maybe once during the initial install but on a modern system kicking off updates before bed and coming back in the morning to an updated computer isn’t unusual (just read any news and postinst messages).

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was using it, every two or three months. And even then, kick off an update or install, go to the bathroom, get some coffee, come back and it’s ready.