If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

  • Soulg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s fine with me, I don’t have any interest in “let’s just kill a bunch of people” as an ideology. It’s objectively wrong.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s not the ideology though, guillotine memes are essentially just pushing for revolutionary restructuring of the state and economy. Nobody simply thinks “kill rich” and stops thinking there.

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Nobody simply thinks “kill rich” and stops thinking there.

        That’s news to me, I always got the impression that “???” Was the next step after “kill rich”

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          More accurately, revolutionary restructuring of society is the first step towards a better future.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The guillotines aren’t necessary if the rich would strive for a better society.

      The thing is that they would never agree to that, so then we need the guillotine.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The path to a better society is elimination of Capitalism, so Capitalists aren’t really going to agree to that, no matter how nice it would make things.

    • harmsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In this case it would be self-defense. The only reason anyone thinks otherwise is because the danger posed by a billionaire money hoarder is far more abstract than what most people are accustomed to.