Which he did. You’re just too dense to understand transitive properties of words. Like how him saying the slate electors and you not understanding that actually would end up being a coup. That’s straight up an anti democracy system nobody voted for. What he’s advocating for is a coup of the current form of government. That’s what that fucking word means you trolling little dipshit.
“He said he WOULD HAVE done a coup, not that he WOULD DO it, totally different!!!1!”
It is totally different… if that is what he even said, which he didn’t.
Which he did. You’re just too dense to understand transitive properties of words. Like how him saying the slate electors and you not understanding that actually would end up being a coup. That’s straight up an anti democracy system nobody voted for. What he’s advocating for is a coup of the current form of government. That’s what that fucking word means you trolling little dipshit.
You mean state’s choosing an alternate form of election which is within their right? The constitution does not mandate how state elections work.
There’s nothing in the constitution about how child pornography is illegal, but it is. You understand how laws work, right?
This is my last response to feeding the troll.
You’re welcome to reply with more deranged, unhinged, shit though, that’s been your thing so far.