the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.
They’re for all intents the same. Ask the native Americans if there was a difference between the colonizers and when we formed a nation with immigrants
Do you honestly believe it is logical to equate colonialism to immigration?
Yes actually. Why wouldnt they be the same thing?
You must not be very familiar with the impacts of colonialism then. Take your time and read these:
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/09/a-quick-reminder-of-why-colonialism-was-bad
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/current-affairs-magazine/
https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/Colonialism/
Equating the two is laughable. You are equating
conquest
the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.
Removed by mod
Because colonizer is an edge lord word.
They’re for all intents the same. Ask the native Americans if there was a difference between the colonizers and when we formed a nation with immigrants
___ is left of center right, so it is [dismissive label].
Thank you edge lord.
Now can you answer the question or are you just going to do you same MO?
It’s really inspiring that you’re resorting to insults immediately after becoming a mod.
Can you answer the question or not?
Can you be civil or not?
I am civil. Last time I am asking, can you answer the question or not?