• penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve read somewhere that iMessage wasn’t considered “big enough” to be considerate a monopoly. Which is bullshit if you ask me.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        10 months ago

        Kinda true in Europe though. Don’t know anyone who uses iMessage, it’s pretty much irrelevant. I know the situation in the US is quite different, but ultimately they don’t regulate for the US market.

      • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        Its only big in the US, most of the planet only sees iMessage as that borderline useless app Apple bundles in their phones.

      • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think it’s ever happened to me that anyone told me that it was inconvenient for them that I didn’t have iMessage, compared to pretty much weekly exclamations of “But why can’t you just use WhatsApp like everyone else!?”

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Apple would still feel pressure to add interoperability if all other big players do. iMessage would have a competitive disadvantage if it’s the only one where users are unable to message the rest of the world.

          • Hirom@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yes. Still, it would be harder to not give a f if others walled gardens open up, and iMessage get disadvantaged by that wall.

            It’s as if iPhones were only able to make calls to other iPhones. Whereas all other devices where able to make calls to any device from any other vendor.