• Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly… I don’t get this. It’s a bit more work than other distros but I think that Linux users often get to a point in their Linux journey where customizing a system with defaults is more difficult than just starting from a blank slate.

    • nik282000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Customizing all-in-one distros is a shitty uphill battle that isn’t worth the trouble, so I get how Arch is worth the work there. But recommending a kit car when people are asking for a commuter just bugs me.

    • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t find this the case at all. I barely change the wallpaper, I’m not spending time removing a bunch of stuff I don’t use it just sits there unused. I did my time with Arch and Gentoo (before Arch existed) for years, but I would rather someone else do the work and I will use it as long as it has sane defaults, for my actual work that doesn’t care.

    • tokyo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is definitely not a bit more work. It’s hours and hours of reading manuals, following video guides and configuring every last detail.

      This is a gross simplification

      • Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think reality lies somewhere in the middle. Yes you have to read and yes you have to configure things but the docs are all on the wiki. There’s a point where this is easier than figuring out how to undo the defaults on, say, Ubuntu and do your own thing without official documentation on it.