Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Forget all the worst atrocities. Think about average people going about their daily lives.

    It’s the weekend. You go out and buy some food, some treats, a bottle of wine, some ice tea, some coffee, a new pair of jeans, you have an ice cream, etc. You could drink tap water. You could eat only rice with lentils. You could wear that old pair of trousers, even though they have a hole in them. That would have saved you 100 bucks. Instead you spend it on luxuries.

    You could have donated that 100 bucks to a charity that saved a child’s life. We all know that 100 dollars goes a long way in the third world. Instead we choose to spend that money on luxuries. You could have volunteered at a local charity. Instead you chose to go shopping.

    If you saw some kid drowning in a puddle, watched the kid die a preventable death as you were eating an ice cream, that would be evil.

    We all do that on a daily basis. We know our choices cause suffering, but because that suffering happens far away and we don’t get to see it happen, we happily ignore it.

    That’s everyone. Some of us are “I’ll sometimes buy an ice cream and let a baby cow get turned into pate” evil. Some of us are “I’ll buy gold toilets while a hundred kids die.” evil. But no one is actually good.

    • Rheios@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, your argument is “we can’t ever be perfect so we should never even aspire to be good”, which is sortof putting the cart before the horse. That we can even recognize the distinction of not being special already places in a position where we can try and do a little better. What is better, how much, or how? What even is good or morality? All of those questions are at necessity to even define good, let alone become it. Before even glancing at perfect. Sure it might be an eternal inane treadmill, but just as fish have gills to breathe, we by chance of fate have the organs necessary to think. And that’s just as much in our nature. The fish doesn’t consider how long it has to swim, it just does it towards a target it can see/sense. By the same mechanism that means we aren’t special, why shouldn’t, why wouldn’t, we do the same thing? Just because what we can see/sense may be artificial, imagined, or drempt?