target OS is debian or linux mint

  • d_k_bo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    they are extra heavy in disk space

    While they use more disk space than most native packages, this point is often exaggerated. Flatpak uses deduplication and shared runtimes if multiple apps use the same runtime.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Appimages don’t use any deduplication at all and usually package everything in the app.

        Sometimes they don’t do that though and expect your system to have certain packages, but that can and does cause reliability and portability issues.

        E: portability not probability lol

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I don’t reply to most comments. You should see my inbox, I have hundreds of undealt with notifications. I only even spotted this reply because I was correcting an autocorrect mistake on my previous one.

            My numbers were correct and I explained why.

            And your experience is pretty far from mine, I had to give up on appimages because they are problematic by design.

            And like I said, Flatpak hasn’t been bad on storage for me. It uses deduplication and unlike you I didn’t go out of my way to cherrypick a small handful of applications that just so happened to use three different runtimes in order to bash it.

            Use appimages if that’s what you want, but they’re not really an answer to Flatpaks, due to the huge systematic problems they have.