• Microsoft inadvertently highlighted the benefits of using a local account over a Microsoft account on Windows 11 in a recent support page update.
  • Using a local account allows for offline sign-in, is independent of cloud services, and limits settings, files, and applications to a single device, enhancing privacy.
  • Despite these benefits, Microsoft requires internet access or workarounds for the initial setup of Windows 11, making it challenging to use a local account from the start.
  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    The summary is slightly misleading, you can log in offline on a computer with a MS account. In fairness, the language on the article around this is pretty confusing, but you’re not locked out of your PC if your Internet is down, which is what the bullet point summary implies.

    • best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      offline on a computer with a MS account

      That’s technically impossible because you must create an account… online. Also it’s a Microsoft account which is worse.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, yeah, but that’s the clarification I’m making. By default you DO need a connection to create or sign in to an account to complete the install process as it’s currently presented, but once an account is set up you can log in to that machine whether it’s connected to the Internet or not. The summary makes it sound like you need to be online for every login, which is not the case.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          By default you DO need a connection to create or sign in to an account to complete the install process as it’s currently presented

          You don’t “need” it, they lie to you and imply it’s a requirement, but it isn’t needed. It’ll download updates, and finish the install just fine with local account.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, and you can go back to a local account from a MS account after the fact, I believe. But I’m going with the supported, default flows that MS surfaces to users without any workarounds here. I’m not even trying to nitpick.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I remember it used to be quite common to install an OS and not have internet access. The OS simply lacked the correct LAN or WAN driver; alternatively one might be setting up an OS during an outage.

          What would you even do with a PC that never has internet access? (apart from controlling some machinery maybe).

          This is actually a massive use-case. Basically every piece of heavy machinery is using the OS it shipped with. Those systems naturally are forbidden from connecting to the internet but happily plug away at their job.

          Legacy software in general is a great reason; retro gaming on period-appropriate hardware and OS, for example.

            • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Retro gaming on period-appropriate hardware and OS in 20 years will. (And there likely won’t be security updates for the OS, you would be dumb to connect it to the internet)

              Heavy machinery shipping with windows today does.

              Your OS not having the correct lan/wan driver happens even today (just less often).

              Having an internet outage happens today as well.

              Yeah but none of these use cases call for Windows 11.

              All the use cases I mentioned are relevant with Windows 11. There is a reason people have been yelling Linux around every corner, and it is because of continued bad decisions by Microsoft like requiring and internet connection for stuff that simply shouldn’t.

              • MudMan@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                OK, look, I don’t like the online auth requirement for Windows 11, I think it’s dumb and finicky. I’m not trying to defend it here, I was just trying to correct the record on a slightly misleading summary…

                …but come on, any user with those needs can work around the login in like five minutes.

                Retro gaming in 20 years will either work just fine on the next version of Windows or work on a Win11 install supporting an offline account. Heavy machinery shipping with Windows will presumably ship in a state where it can be authetnticated, so it should have some way to be online or to update to a version of Windows that does have auth servers, if Win11 stops having those for some reason. Bad drivers or simply not having connectivity hardware just requires using a USB device. Your phone will USB tether long enough to log in to Windows on first install just fine, I’ve done it before.

                Don’t get me wrong, it shouldn’t be needed, and it’s a stupid annoyance. The real answer to all those use cases is using the known workarounds to support offline accounts on first boot that MS should continue to surface and offer as a supported option. But let’s not be disingenuously obtuse about how the software actually works. I’ve done way worse to keep a legacy OS running on an old machine.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          What would you even do with a PC that never has internet access?

          The idea that computers should always be online is less than 20 years old. Even in the early 2000s it wasn’t uncommon for most employees in a company to NOT have Internet access. Companies, and people, bought or wrote software and then ran it to accomplish the task. No internet needed.

          I’d argue that many employees in regular non-technical positions STILL don’t require Internet access to do their job unless they have to sign into some kind of cloud portal

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I vividly remember the first time I heard someone suggest an always-online computer being a thing. I couldn’t imagine the use for that, and the security implications terrified me. Let alone the cost, because of course I assumed I’d be paying for that by the minute.

            Shouldn’t give people ideas, I suppose.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I barely notice when I don’t have Internet access anymore, because I use my PC as a media server to stream to every other device in my house. Not having the Internet basically just restricts the games I can play slightly

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it’s been more than 30 or 60 days (can’t remember which) you will be unable to sign in if you don’t have an active internet connection. I found that out in 2022 when I had to travel for work (90 days in a fairly remote area) and the only internet connection I had was at the worksite on a company computer.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Was that a work computer? I know on a work laptop I did have some time restrictions set by IT because they had some authentication policies, but my understanding is that on a Windows Home account you control there should be no time limit, although it may complain about your MS apps or treat it as a not-activated install after a while, I’m not sure. I admit that I have never put that to the test on a Win 11 PC. I definitely did on MS-account enabled Win 10, since I’ve stashed older PCs and then turned them back on offline later, but I don’t think I’ve had an idle Win11 machine more than three months yet.