GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users’ repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    87
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Whataboutism” is what Americans say to profess blind faith in their exceptionalism.

      • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        84
        ·
        5 months ago

        So you have even less reason to use the racist-in-origin and logically fallacious term.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Lmao it’s literally the name of a logical fallacy. How is the term itself fallacious?

          Also I harbour no racism or ill will toward the Chinese people. My girlfriend is Chinese and I care about her a lot and love learning about her culture. I just don’t abide the human rights atrocities (or censorship thereof) committed by any government.

            • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              35
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s funny how much effort you’re going to debating my word choice instead of the meaning and content of my rebuttal to your stupid comment. Do you have an actual point here? Are you claiming that what you were doing above wasn’t whataboutism? That it’s somehow a valid counterpoint to my joke about CCP censorship to say that the US also does bad things?

              • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                51
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Your rebuttal was nothing more than a word choice. And you’re still using it.

                The reason you’re doing this is because if you use the actual fallacy’s name, rather than the US empire’s “and you are lynching negros”, you’re more likely to see your error.

            • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Hahahahahahahaha, oh man, how much you spend on a psychologist every month?

              Also, what you’re doing is called sophistry, specifically moving the goal posts (which predates the US by about 1000 years).

              You later move on to attacking the person, rather than the argument (more sophistry).

              You should probably educate yourself lest you expose the clown inside.

            • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              1.it’s a euphemism for “And You Are Lynching Negroes” - that’s literally what people used to say instead of whataboutism

              lol who do you think was saying this, and how is “whataboutism” in any way of a euphemism for it? Did you even bother to read the article you linked?

                • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  America didn’t drop anything because they weren’t saying it in the first place, the Soviets were. America also aren’t the ones that coined a new phrase for it, British royalists were, who probably had no knowledge of the Russian phrase. All of this was explained in the article you linked.