• Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it works well for the job that it’s tasked to perform, why change it? It’s got the added benefit of being an unintentional security feature now too, as very few others will even have a drive for reading them. Sort of like how manual transmissions are much less likely to be stolen now.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is a great point, but it probably doesn’t do the job as well as more modern alternatives.

      1. Easy to lose, possible data leak concerns.
      2. Easy to retain data that should have been deleted.
      3. Easy to lose data if a disk gets lost or damaged.
      4. Likely wastes time when trying to track down the disk you need to getting someone to transfer it.
      5. Lack of access logs and auditing capabilities.
      6. Easy way for viruses to spread.

      Modern IT managed file servers solve a lot of real problems when well-managed.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      On the other hand, if you use an old technology that isn’t being mass produced anymore, it can reach a point where it will become a big liability for a mission-critical piece of equipment.

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think there was something about the US government having to finally get rid of vacuum tubes because the only suppliers were in Russia.

      • Mpatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yah this is bad I run a cnc plasma table, big table 10 feet x 20 feet. It uses floppy disks. Pain in the ass to find a new drive and pain in the ass to find new disks because constant write re write emf and metal dust kills them. But despite that it’s still cheaper and easier than a $15k retro fit to a more modern controler.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          If it works well for the job

          Your example is one where it clearly isn’t a great fit for the job. If you wanted to transfer sensitive data discretely, a floppy could be significantly better than a wired network where you’ve got to worry about America/Russia/China/Israel/Iran and who knows who else peeping on the transfer, or a USB drive which is already known to be compromised by stuxnet derivatives.