• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh man, that doesn’t say anything good about poetry in general, where something that, by definition, has no imagination and cannot come up with something original, outdoes you.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean if it has to rhyme and fit certain meters or rhytmic parameters that can make it far easier to calculate and contrive a pleasing sounding poem with zero regard to the actual intrinsic qualities of the content itself

      I use to do it all the time!

      • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        A sestina based on the rules is, formally speaking, easy. Ask me to write one that will be studied after centuries, and you’re asking for Petrarch.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It doesn’t appeal to the masses.

      Most people don’t “get” poetry. That’s why you don’t see many people sitting around reading books of poetry.

      Many people would probably also choose a short story written by AI over one written by a professional author.

      Heck, I’m sure comments written by AI generally get more upvotes than comments written by humans.