• CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    The overwhelming majority of development to Chromium is done by Google and not the open source contributors to the project. Maintaining a browser is not something that can be done for free as a hobby. It requires an army of full-time developers to sustain.

    Given all of the major browsers except Firefox are using Chromium, the best case scenario for spinning off Chrome is that Microsoft would pick up the lion’s share of development to keep Edge up to date.

    This is the same reason that all of the major Linux distributions have large foundations to support them.

    The DoJ would do less harm to the internet if they just forced Google to sell off Search instead. Then they’d be an advertising and cloud services company that happens to maintain a major browser to serve their ads.

    • aeharding@vger.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Ehh, I wouldn’t consider Safari “using chromium” at this point. It has been hard forked for years. Chrome could disappear tomorrow and it wouldn’t affect Safari development.

      • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Safari has roots in chromium? I thought it was WebKit or something else for it’s engine.

        • coolmojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Safari is using WebKit. WebKit started as a fork of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE and has since been further developed by  KDE contributors, Apple, Google, Nokia, Bitstream, BlackBerry, Sony, Igalia and others. On April 3, 2013, Google announced that it had forked WebCore, a component of WebKit, to be used in future versions of Google Chrome, under the name Blink. Source: Wikipedia