• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Okay. Now, explain the concept of enshitification. And do it using terms that regular folk won’t find crass.

    You know how conservatives live in this bubble where they don’t even see their racism because it’s so normalized? We’re interacting within a bubble where everyone has a very high level of technical competence versus the average person, so we fail to understand just how tech illiterate others are.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Not just tech illiterate but also advertising illiterate. The regular folks I know seem happy to wade through endless platform ads and influencer sales pitches. Enshittification can really be a slowly boiling frog type scenario.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      elon musk bought twitter and turned it to shit. elon (or someone else) could do that with Bluesky too, but can’t with Mastodon.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        So that’s impossible with the fediverse? No way a company like Meta could have a fediverse platform?

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Well the general idea of federation is not the same as “fediverse”. most “fediverse” sites are FOSS which is the main selling point in my opinion. They cannot be sold and do not rely on ad income (and thus preying on people’s cognitive weaknesses with algorithms) to operate. Federation is an added bonus on top of that which allows you to set up your own instance if you want.

          Sure meta could make a federated service of some kind (like bluesky has done), but without being FOSS there’s always the high likelihood of enshittification.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Threads by Meta is on the fediverse. So by describing the fediverse as good, it sounds like Threads is just like Mastodon.

            The topic is too complicated to quickly explain to a novice. Because now you have to explain FOSS, and why that’s sometimes good, but not always since bad actors have used FOSS .

            • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              25 days ago

              it’s not too complicated to give people an elevator pitch. of course there is more detail and nuance to get into (as with with literally everything), but it’s not needed to get the general point across.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      Company focus on profit. even if mean overall experience get not gooder

      I dumbed it down to caveman speech for those that still wouldn’t understand. It’s a simple concept all of use that have used the Internet in the past year have experienced.