Silicon Valley wants us to believe that their autonomous products are a kind of self-guided magic, but the technology is clearly not there yet. A quick peak behind the curtain has consistently revealed a product base that, at a minimum, is still deeply reliant on human workforces.

  • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m starting to get a bit annoyed by takes like this.

    Of course people had to check the automated system. that’s how they are debugged and trained.

    The newsworthy part is just that they missed their target goal of reviewed sales. In the end of the trial they still needed 70% review rate instead of their goal of 5%.

    The system was still fully automated. But some needed checks after the sales happened. That’s what trials are there for

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Or you could, you know, pay a person a living wage to be physically present at the store to assist shoppers and review the sales.

      Or, hear me out. Maybe a 70% review requirement is not automation at all. Just saying.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        You could, yes. And that should be the criticism.

        If you attack them on bullshit terms, you do exactly what they want and they can go “well, those idiots don’t even know what they are talking about”.

        Maybe a 70% review requirement is not automation at all

        And amazon agrees. which is why they closed the experiment down