If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • cacheson@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I was just looking through literature.cafe a bit, and came across this excellent comment chain by Janvier. It outlines the history and culture of Hexbear, and makes a very solid argument for defederating them.

    TL;DR- Don’t defederate Hexbear because they’re a bunch of genocide-apologist authoritarians. Defederate them because they’re annoying, and will burn out your moderators.

  • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hexbear recently federated with sh.itjust.works, I don’t know if it was polled on your side or what. But on Hexbear’s side there was a thread to discuss it.

  • Mr_Buscemi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sucks for you guys. They caused nothing but trouble when they were still federated with Blahaj.

    After so many of us complained about how they were being dicks and many on the instance weren’t feeling comfortable, hexbear decided to defederate from us first since they somehow said it wasn’t safe for their LGBT members to be on it.

    Funny enough a few days later a new account started posting across different lemmy instances for days about how the Blahaj instance was anti trans and that the admin was too. Our Admin is openly trans :/

    The whole argument started because the user said everything had to be political and wouldn’t stop insulting others who said they didn’t want to have every post on Blahaj to turn political.

    It was just too perfect timing how a few days after hexbear defedarated for somehow saying the pro LGBT instance was anti-LGBT, that we got a brand new account attacking trans members while sayin they were anti-trans.

    Enjoy your new people.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t mind the general hexbear ideology in itself. Sure. You do you.

    But, damn, I see more than a few of its members just being obnoxious.

  • narp@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Opinion of one of the admins regarding hexbear, just so you guys know where they stand:

    In my view, the hexbear community is actually a positive force on this platform. They are frequently abrasive, but they ultimately have the potential to contribute to what we are building here. They are extremely active and some of them are quite intelligent. But they’ve also become accustomed to a privileged position on their own walled-in platform, and they need to be reminded that their views are considered ver extreme by the average person.

  • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol I blocked the most annoying posters from hexbear on this thread and now there’s hardly any comments. I think we should put them in time out. Like defederate for 15 days. if they keep brigading, another 15 days. I don’t really want to defederate, but I hate this kind of brigading.

  • wtvr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such bullshit. Just saw the announcement that we aren’t going to defederate from hexbear. Why weren’t we given a say in this?

  • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appear to be out of the loop. What’s wrong with hexbear? I’m not familiar with the instance.

    • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re just an annoying bunch of wannabe communists who sound incredibly smug and post a ton of stickers in comments. Having said that I’ve moved to lemm.ee when lemmy.world defeterated from hexbear.

      • NormalC [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        57
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wannabe communists

        There’s a lot to unpack in that one. First of all, how do you even gatekeep being a communist? Surely you don’t hold a degree in Marxist-Leninist thought? Nor are you a hexbear yourself.

        Or perhaps since you have this perception that we are all petite bourgeoisie (mostly white) in the imperialist core that we can’t actually be communists (ignoring how paradoxical that is)

        Perhaps communism in your mind is only for the “orient” and global south. Those in the “West” must just be play acting.

        • Gsus4@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When you guys mention the imperial core, what are you talking about? DC? Hollywood? Wall Street? Brussels? London? Paris? Berlin? The Hague? Where is this imperial core you keep mentioning?

          • SpookyGenderCommunist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            66
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “imperial core” isn’t a phrase we made up. It refers to World Systems Theory, a theory of international relations invented by a guy named Immanuel Wallerstein which argues that imperial “Core” countries (think the traditional “developed” or “first world” countries. Mainly the US and Europe) have a particular extractive, colonial relationship with “Periphery” countries (think poor, raw material exporting, rentier states like Kyrgyzstan or Nigeria).

            Then there are semi-periphery countries which are still tied into the imperial core in some way, but have enough sway economically and geopolitically to kind of stand on their own. They have a different kind of relationship to the imperial core, compared to the periphery (these would be the BRICS countries, largely).

            That’s a gross over simplification, but hopefully that answers your question.

            Edit: Here’s a really good explanation of World Systems Theory that goes into more depth

            • Gsus4@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              34
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wasn’t aware of this framework, thank you for taking the time to explain it :)

            • PutangInaMo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              To be fair, colonialism is a human trait and it’s been proven in every large society time and time again. You think the current US/UK empire is bad but if you look in your own back yard it’s the same thing with a different spin.

              It is inevitable, humans are destined for this. It’s unfortunate but it’s what we do.

              • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                31
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                yeah but the thing is other countries’ policies didn’t inspire apartied and the nazis and their holocaust.

                the US’s exterminationist and segregationalist The US did those thing

                Hitler wrote in his diary how good america was at genociding its undesireables, and took it and ran with it

                The United States: world leader in being the absolute fucking worst thing in human history since 1619

                • PutangInaMo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But that’s kind of my point. The CCP engages in almost identical policies and political strategy. It’s just under a different banner with a different mascot.

              • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                28
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You think the current US/UK empire is bad but if you look in your own back yard it’s the same thing with a different spin.

                I don’t think any non-Western country has enslaved a continent, refused to pay reparations for enslaving an entire continent, and continue to plunder an entire continent of its resources.

                • PutangInaMo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Japan, China, Persian empire, Egypt, Spain, US, UK, Cambodia, et al.

                  History is nasty, our goal should be to learn from it and not repeat it.

            • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              1 year ago

              I genuinely would like to understand what you guys at hexbear are about but every time I poke my head into that instance you guys are “dunking” every other instance with language nobody else understands. It’s very alienating.

              • dolphin [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                51
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol that’s fair. We’ve developed a pretty insular culture over the past three years and I can see how it’s hard to decipher.

                • yuri@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you guys are also like, just huge dicks without provocation. like all the fucken time. 99% of what i see from hexbear users is either condescension or outright hostility.

              • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                46
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly your best bet is probably to do some reading first, unfortunately. A lot of Hexbear dialect is that way because it’s tied to concepts that come from books and thinkers we’re broadly familiar with.

                If you’re more into video stuff you could try this guy. I think he’s pretty approachable.

                Actually if you went into the megathreads and asked most people would probably give you suggestions too. We are fiesty but in my experience we also like to be helpful to people with questions.

              • Venus [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                42
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’re literally just communists. Read any introductory text to communism and 99% of what we say will make sense in context.

              • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                34
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you ask good faith questions and give context for why “Hey, I’m a liberal and I don’t understand X could you explain what you mean?”

                You WILL get excellent engagement and people will give you very good answers

                its easy, and if you genuinely want to learn give it a shot

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                31
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                New tagline dropped @[email protected]

                Seriously though you are more than welcome to ask, I would recommend the news mega. If you ask questions in gold faith there’s a wealth of users willing to interact with you

              • epicspongee [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                To be clear in the dunking threads folks are not usually engaging in good faith with us. When I was on another server and replied with actual questions to stuff everyone was incredibly nice to me and explained stuff super well. Can agree though that folks can see dunking as alientating. I promise though if you can get past that it’s one of the friendliest communities I’ve found on the web.

          • HornyOnMain [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            56
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            The imperial core is the countries that have been most involved in the imperialist plunder of other nations, so that would be the US, Canada, UK, France, Belgium, Germany, etcetera

          • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know how any time there’s a map where it colors countries who vote on UN resolutions, or countries where you can be thrown in jail for being poor, etc etc etc etc, you know how its usually a very similar map with US Europe and western allies on one side, and the entire rest of the world (the other 6.5 billion people) on the other?

            Yeah, that teeny group that seems to always get its way controlling global politics is the imperial core.

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Another user already explained world systems theory, but there’s also the school of global historical materialism, that analyses the relationship and structure of the imperial core/triad and the periphery/global south. Samir Amin was a leading figure in that, he also coined the term “Eurocentrism”. You can find quite a few recordings of his lectures for free on YouTube, or pirate his books (he’s dead now, so it’s not like he’d get the money anyways).

        • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve grown up under a communist government in a socialist republic. So while I have no degree in Marxism-Leninism, I can assure you that all of my schooling was infused with it. Same goes for most of popular culture. I don’t despise communism, as is often the case with people like me, the idea is noble, if utopian. The ideology, like all ideologies, is scary for its intolerance and disregard of human nature. I will therefore gatekeep any pure ideolog, just to save my own faith in humanity.

          • NormalC [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve grown up under a communist government in a socialist republic…

            Huh? That’s a very roundabout way of describing a communist state. Where do you come from specifically? You can count communist states on your fingertips.

            ideology, like all ideologies, is scary for its intolerance and disregard of human nature…

            I don’t think that’s what the word “ideology” means. Also it’s dangerous and unproductive to off-handedly remark on “human nature.” It’s a bad faith psuedoscientific buzzword that’s rooted in uncontextualized historical analysis. Nothing happens in a vacuum.

            I will therefore gatekeep any pure ideolog, just to save my own faith in humanity.

            Again, I’m not quite sure what this means. I think you’re conflating a lot of things here that just don’t make sense and I dont want to make any assumptions about you. No community can ever be immune to reactionary politics, but thats not the same as rejecting “pure ideology”

            • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you put down the thesaurus and actually think about things you will perhaps start to understand. I grew up in former Czechoslovakia until my adulthood under the rule of the communist party until we overthrew them in 1989. The effects of that time are still with me. The human nature that came to light during communist rule would make your hair stand on end. All in pursuit of ideology. You can’t comprehend what you’re advocating for further than some utopian theory you read.

            • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What? You have nothing to say now? I would appreciate if you stated your position to my replies to you.

        • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My apologies, I was generalising. I’ve had perfectly normal interactions with hexbear users, but I also saw a bunch of very circlejerky threads populated by hexbear users which I found unbearable (or should it be unhexbearable?).

            • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thank you for your open minded approach. Obviously I don’t save posts or comments that annoy me, but now I see one of those as a response to my comment (large gif/jpg with no text). Earlier today I saw a post about brigading that was stupid, but I’m not throwing all hexbears into the same basket, a bunch of the comments were completely nuts. I couldn’t find it again, instead I found this one: https://hexbear.net/post/502637 Again, it’s not a crime, people can circlejerk however they want. What really annoys me is when I come across a post where I’m interested in reading people’s opinions one the subject and the comments are filled with stickers. Strangely enough no other community does that.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lots of tankies from what I’m seeing, they’re the “alt-left” if you will, they believe in just as much weird stuff as the alt-right but are on the left side of the spectrum… Heck they end up meeting on many things…

      • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could you provide an example of Hexbears agreeing with the alt-right about something specific? I think a lot of people conflate “disagreeing with the liberal consensus” with “thinking a MAGA thing” when they’re really pretty different.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              When being “not pro west” means not analyzing the conflict but simply adopting the same point of view as Russian propaganda just because Ukraine is supported by the west then yeah, you’re pro Russia.

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                33
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                What are you talking about? We have a huge incredibly active news mega that does analysis daily. The fact that we are as sceptical of western media as we are of russian is a good thing. You shouldn’t just uncritically swallow state department propaganda. You should investigate claims made, instead of just accepting them.

              • PandaBearGreen [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                31
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why can’t you see the difference? We see the west and Nato as having propagated and profited off of this conflict. Russia is guilty as well as Ukraine in fanning the flames of war. But peace is a far better alternative to war and far better than flooding the area with weapons. Weapons that will continue to do damage long after hostility ends. Pro Russia How?

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                When being “not pro west” means not analyzing the conflict

                Just like you analyzed our news megathreads from the last year to make this assessment?

                It just fucking baffles me how people from other instances feel so comfortable talking shit straight from their ass. I just don’t understand the mentality. It’s fucking slimy. You can just do that shit and you don’t feel dirty?

        • McNasty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mostly about China and North Korea.

          Alt right and alt left both deny Uyghur camps, and think Kim Jong Un is pretty awesome.

          • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            67
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In my experience alt right folks are pretty anti China, to the point where that is often the reason they oppose the Ukraine war, as it is dividing the attention of the Christian west from the rising, menacing Tigers that threaten white society.

            Hexbears are often skeptical of Adrian Zenz who is usually the source of claims about China. Most that I’ve seen acknowledge that there are camps (China openly says it is running programs to deradicalize separatists and fundamentalists in the region), but disagree that they are as bad as western media depicts them, and would probably argue that western nations are concern trolling about the issue regardless because it is easy to question whether American foreign policy is motivated by concern for Muslims. Genuinely curious, who is an alt-right guy who doesn’t think there are camps in Xinjiang? I’ve never encountered a pro-Chinese reactionary.

            As to Korea I thought MAGA types just memed about Kim Jong Un because Trump sort of got along with him. Hexbears think that the Korean War was bad and that Korea is acting predictably given that a nuclear power is constantly threatening them with annihilation. There are a variety of positions in Hexbear on the DPRK though, and I can’t really account for all of them, but I think they arise out of a genuine anti-imperial and anti-war sentiment, and a healthy doze of skepticism of western narratives of a state enemy. I don’t think you could say that for the alt right.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Last I checked the alt right believes them same claims about the world that dems do in terms of the supposed camps, they just think they are good because the alt right hates muslims

        • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You guys and the MAGA types seem to have very similar views on the Russia/Ukraine situation at the moment.

          • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Could you be more specific?

            I think, for example, that most alt-right types oppose the war either because of chauvinistic beliefs about American boys and American blood and treasure being spent on foreigners, or because they would like to work together with Russia to counter China and think a war with them hurts the white struggle against the eastern hordes. No one on hexbear would defend either of those positions.

            It needs to be more specific than “both of you are against continuing the war.” Just like it wouldn’t be fair for me to accuse you of being alt- right because you and them both agree that there weren’t WMDs in Iraq and that that invasion was sold on false pretenses. You might both technically agree but it would be missing the point.

            • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s theories about how spheres of influence work, that Russia has a right to take over Ukraine, or at least override it politically. Very much similar to Kissinger’s Great power politics in the days of the USSR. It’s somewhat different than the Russian right which is their divine right to Empire, over the Ukrainians and the Poles and Slavic countries in general. The ideologues Ivan Ilyin and Karl Schmidt influence that part. But notably, both parts believe that there’s a place that Russia must dominate in Europe, and that other great powers must not interfere there. Leftists also are influenced by these theories, especially when they remember the reaches of the Iron Curtain far into Central Europe. The USSR had a history of intervening into the politics of its satellite states. Notably in Hungary when there were democratic protests, they sent in tanks to quell the uprising. This theory echoes in 2014 when the Ukrainians changed their government, and Russia invades and annexes Crimea. Many on the far left and far right see the massive protests as creeping American influence that does not belong in the region. They fear NATO expansion as it is a threat to Russia; In the west it’s Russia itself, and in Russia, it’s Russian greatness in Empire.

              • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry, I’m not sure I understand. Liberals don’t believe that countries exert influence on other countries around them? You think Joe Biden objects to the concept of spheres of influence? You brought up Kissinger, you don’t think US foreign policy is operating under the logic of realpolitik? I’m not sure what the alternative is to believing that countries act to pursue their interests in other countries. That just sounds like a description of the concept of foreign policy.

              • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                notably in Hungary when there were democratic protests

                You’re talking about the fascist uprising where they went around marking the houses of Jews and Communists for extermination, like only a decade after the Soviets saved the world from Hitler?

            • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              How is being pro russia and wanting war to end in any way compatible though? They invaded Ukraine. They literally started a war. That’s a pretty disgusting deflection tbh

              • 420LetPobedy [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                NATO/US started the war when they couped the democratically elected Ukrainian government in 2014, and when the US installed regime started bombing civilians in the Donbass

                • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh so Russia is just saving Ukrainians from US imperialism by bombing them and committing war crimes. Thank god for our wonderful leader putin o7

              • Venus [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                Russia started a war. Ukraine has two choices. Surrender and end the bloodshed, or fight tooth and nail and pour more innocent people into the meat grinder and then surrender. There is not a third option. Obviously they should choose the former.

              • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’re just not keeping our head in the sand here. Ukraine is not taking back Crimea, or even the Donbas. The counteroffensive failed horribly. Cheering for more bloodshed isn’t going to make a better outcome in the end.

                • Zirconium@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “cheering for more bloodshed.” Are you telling on yourself? You act like a counteroffensive is supposed to be fast and easy. It’s not, war is bloody and deadly and Russia is not going to call for peace until they achieve their objective of overthrowing the Ukrainian government or achieving a peace deal where they can keep Ukraine’s economic sectors

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                They can either surrender now, or surrender when all the able bodied people have been killed for no good reason. Ukraine can no longer win this war.

                • Zirconium@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “Ukraine should surrender so that they can spare their civilian and combatant lives to Russia which totally won’t abuse their land and people as they’ve done in the past”

              • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you think we’re in charge of the Russian military? The war is going to end eventually one way or another. We might as well push for the path that preserves Ukrainian lives.

                • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Are we in charge of the Ukrainian military? Not that it really matters, but still.

                  Russia can unilaterally end the conflict. Ukraine cannot (yet). Calling on Ukrainians to surrender while they still want to defend themselves is cowardice. I would rather support their continued struggle.

              • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Damn too bad they’re not going to do that, so what should we do about that? We support a negotiated settlement to the conflict in order to achieve peace, you support marching every single Ukrainian person into a meat grinder to die. Which of is more right wing?

                • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This isn’t about us. What “we” should do is to support and show solidarity with the side being attacked by an imperialist, dictatorial state and help them defend themselves.

                  When the Finnish were defending themselves in the Winter War it would not have been just to say “they should just surrender to save their lives”. The Finns did eventually surrender, but only after they had stomped the Soviet army all across Finland. They continued fighting not to die but so that they could live.

                  The Ukrainians are fighting now not to die but so that they can live in (relative) freedom.

                  Again, this “we should just capitulate to whatever warmongers want” stuff is shameful and cowardly, doubly so for people on the Left.

            • yuri@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              imagine dying on the “war is bad” hill. i can agree on that point, and i don’t even need to politically align myself with real shitters and make a fool of myself in pseudo-public to do it!

                • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Bro, this war is totally different to every other war, bro!

                  Trust me, bro! I know we got duped into supporting:

                  The Korean War

                  The Vietnam War

                  The war in Iraq

                  The other war in Iraq

                  The war in Afghanistan

                  The war in the Philippines

                  The war in Guatemala

                  The war on Cuba

                  The war in Laos

                  The war in Cambodia

                  The war in Somalia

                  The war in Yemen

                  The war in Libya

                  The war in Grenada

                  The war in Yugoslavia

                  …but this time it’s an existential threat!! Trust me, bro!

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Very” implies you’ve drilled down beyond the very first superficial similarity.

            Please offer two things in which we have in common since you’re clearly not just talking out of your ass.

      • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Heck they end up meeting on many things…

        name literally a single one or quit spreading this bullshit.

              • Staines [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Why are you linking an actual propaganda thinktank as an example as of Uyghur Genocide?

                You could link any source, but you link one that is staffed by people who’s careers have been purely to lie about American’s enemies and push American interests?? I hope you’re a little sharper than that and you’re just linking that because you hope other people will swallow anything.

                “HEY GUYS THIS ORGANIZATION THAT IS PAID TO TELL ME THAT CHINA IS BAD, GET THIS, SAYS CHINA IS BAD!!”

                Come on bud.

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                While I think nay accusation of genocide should be taken seriously and investigated, I do not think we should accept these claims without basis, and we have to accept that despite several years of allegations, no proof has been provided. Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang. Here’s a carrd with mainly Western sources debunking the claims of genocide https://xinjiangahr.carrd.co/

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang

                  That’s very misleading. They say they have insufficient proof to say it is racially motivated. (Which is a prerequisite for genocide) But there is certainly great oppression happening there.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being pro Russia, genocide denialism, authoritarianism, being hateful of ideas that don’t conform to their worldview, racism (just not towards the same people), the list goes on and on.

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            44
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being anti-nato does not mean we are pro-russia.
            Specifically which genocide is being denied?
            Define “authoritarianism”.
            Yes we are hateful towards racism, sexism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia and fascism.
            What racism is being done by hexbear users? The mod team takes such things very seriously

          • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            43
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey, I’m a Hexbear user and I really think you have the wrong impression of what our site is. Idk if you’re open to reconsidering or if you’re just trying to get a few antagonistic words in but I’ll tell you my experience as a long time user:

            Being pro Russia

            Our site isn’t pro-russia. We just want the war to come to a swift end without any further bloodshed. Some people take offense to that because we don’t think the best way to do that is to send more guns, tanks, planes, dollars, etc into the warzone. That benefits no one except the arms manufacturers and the money lenders. Not regular people on either side.

            genocide denialism

            The only thing I can think of that you would be referring to is the “holodomor” or something similar that happened in the USSR. It’s not that we deny that many people did die in these horrible tragedies or that there wasn’t Soviet government involvement in some of them but that these very real events are being distorted for political reasons by people who want to paint the USSR in a certain, wholly bad, light. As communists (or anarchists), we try to be very open to criticism and new ways of thinking about or doing things but not when the intent is to do historical revisionism to make the people who liberated the concentration camps and ended the crimes of Nazism seem like Nazis under a different name.

            Authoritarianism

            Well, I guess this is true in a way. As revolutionists, we do seek to change the system by establishing a new authority with the capability to make this change. But have you ever noticed how the current system maintains and perpetuates itself? Sure, you can vote (and we don’t seek to abolish that!), but when that fails and working-class people take to the streets seeking change, why is it that people with guns and tear gas and riot shields try to stop them and maybe even imprison them? It’s not that leftists are uniquely “authoritarian” but that we want to use that authority for representing regular, working-class people and to bring about a better world where that authority isn’t necessary anymore. Our anarchist users probably have a somewhat different take on this but one of them will have to talk about it lol

            being hateful of ideas that don’t conform to their worldview

            Sure, there are a lot of ideas that we hate. But isn’t that everyone? I hope we could all agree on hating things like fascism, racism, sexism, transphobia, etc etc. Our users probably feel more strongly about that than most people lol but that’s just cuz a lot of us have been targets of those kinds of ideas. Other than stuff like that though… this site has been one of the most accepting places on the Internet in my experience. Sure, we argue a lot (sometimes too zealously lol), but just cuz we care a lot about getting things right. On our site, we don’t have downvotes to encourage users to actually challenge bad ideas and voice their opinion instead of just feeling satisfied having slightly influenced an algorithm.

            racism (just not towards the same people)

            This just hasn’t been my experience and I know most of our users would agree. Racism gets swiftly removed on Hexbear and lots of people replying challenging it. Do you have any examples? This has just been so contrary to my time on the site. Unless you mean jokes about white people but I hope I don’t have to explain why that’s not a problem lol

            Anyway, I just want our instances and our users to exist together in peace. I know we have very “different” ideas from what is considered the mainstream in the west and on most of the English-speaking internet but I know our presence on the “fediverse” can be a positive thing and that we can get along. I hope this helps you to understand our site a bit better.

            • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              The whole “we want to end the war” argument just reeks. It stinks of russian propaganda. Russia started the war. They invaded Ukraine. Would you have the same viewpoint if the US was the invader? I’ve seen that comment several times and it kinda starts sounding like a red fascist dogwhistle

            • hakase@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Unless by racism you mean racism but I hope I don’t have to explain why racism isn’t a problem lol

              🤡🤡🤡

              • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Do you think “anti-white racism” is even remotely as bad as other forms of racism? Or even a problem at all? White people already have all the privileges bestowed upon them by a fundamentally white-supremacist society. Making fun of this concept on our tiny social media website isn’t hurting anyone.

                • hakase@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Do you think “anti-white racism” is even remotely as bad as other forms of racism?

                  In the vast majority of cases, no, not even close.

                  Or even a problem at all?

                  It’s 100% a problem, for multiple reasons. First and foremost, it’s racist, so it’s already inherently a problem for that reason alone. But it’s also a problem because your [hexbear’s] moralistic self-righteousness combined with your [hexbear’s] obvious hypocrisy gives people opposed to your ideals that much more ammunition (and of course you don’t care about that, but that itself is also part of the hexbear problem).

                  And the worst part is that, as with so many of hexbear’s problems, there’s no reason for it. It’s such an easy problem to fix, and would give an instance like hexbear that supposedly prides itself on its inclusivity such a huge boost in credibility. If you want to set yourselves up as morally unimpeachable, then be morally unimpeachable! Set an actual example, and be leaders that bring people together, not because of compromising your beliefs, but by actually being consistent, steadfast, and intellectually honest about the beliefs you already have.

                  And sure, I get the importance of having a place where you can feel comfortable and meme hyperbolically about problems you feel are important, and about the people who don’t agree with you. That seems to be the direction that most hexbears seem to want to go.

                  But, in the end, it is racist, and it is disingenuous to promote yourselves as this bastion of anti-racism while encouraging literal racism on your instance and then act all surprised pikachu face when you get called out on it.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Really? Go tell that to Jews… Or the Irish… Or Acadians (heck, french Canadians in general)… The list goes on and on…

          • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one here is pro Russia lol. We just recognize that the war in Ukraine is an intractable meat grinder, and working for peace is more productive than continuing the conflict in an effort to further enrich War Contractors.

    • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you’re familiar with CTH and the dirtbag left, Hexbear is where they went after being banned by Reddit.

      For what it is when lemm.ee considered de-federated from them they flooded the instance turning a 200 comment thread into 1200. And lots of harassment. Edit: In case you wanted to read that clusterbomb of a thread: https://lemm.ee/post/4543536

      • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had to look them up but yep I do remember CTH. Thanks for the answer, I’ll keep an eye out.

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? There’s plenty of nonsense in there, for example:

          [https://lemm.ee/comment/2394714](also, fuck off landlord. Mao was right.)

          From the wiki:

          In this vein, Mao insisted that the people themselves, not the public security organs, should become involved in enacting the Land Reform Law and killing the landlords who had oppressed them, in contrast to the Soviet practice of dekulakization.

          … yikes. That said, it’s online bickering, there’s always going to be examples of bad behaviour.

          As for my own, unasked, opinion on hexbear. I don’t really notice them around. Maybe its because I’m blind to them as I am generally left leaning, I did by contrast notice the EH memes before they were defederated. I’m generally an all/new scroller on Lemmy.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, no, they’re right on this one. Killing your landlord is good actually. Like literally everything else Mao did was bad, but he was right on this.

            • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m a little more reserved. I would peg my response to their attitude to change.

              If they’re willing to step aside, or even support shelter becoming a human right, then I’ve got bigger problems than them.

              If they’re going to cling tooth and nail to a system that sees people freeze and starve for their own enrichment then yeah, fuck 'em.

              • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If they’re willing to step aside, or even support shelter becoming a human right

                I mean, they could do that now. They don’t gotta wait until the knives are at their throat–though if that does happen, i expect plenty will say whatever they think will get them off the hook.

                • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, the people who believe that landlords should be killed could do that now. They don’t gotta wait either.

            • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I get the feeling if you learnt more about Mao you’d find a lot of things you’d want to add to your list.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anyone who downvoted the above post is free to go back to reddit. You clearly do not understand how the internet works, return to your walled garden.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had some conversations here. They were saying that north Korea is a lovely democracy, Russia is totally justified in Ukraine, and China isn’t doing anything to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang. Just some examples from yesterday.