There is a reason for USB-C extensions not to be part of the standard. They can be bothersome in the best case and dangerous in the worst.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      295
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So a standard cable needs to be chipped to show its rating to the device, its not that the device can pull what it wants or can get, but the cable itself tells it what it can supply. Extension cables can’t do that, because it doesn’t know what it’s plugged into, and that would be if they even bothered to put a chip in. They instead piggy back off the chip for the main cable. The problem comes when you you have a 240 watt cable hooked up to a cheap 120 watt cable, with the device being told it can push 240, and starts to super heat the extension cable

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Brilliant thanks

        5 sentences that inexplicably need a 9 minute video to say

        Fuck YouTube

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Interesting, I’d never trust any USB cable to push anywhere near 100 watts anyway haha good god, the most I ever do is maybe 20w at 5v.

        I’ll keep that in mind when buying cables in the future though this is very useful info!

        • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          As a point of reference, Lenovo Thinkpad’s have something of a cult following for their reliability and versatility.

          My T490s has a USB-C power supply which provides 45w (20v at 2.25a).

          The thing is, when docked it’s not only pulling power through that cable, but also network, USB devices, and providing video for 2x monitors in 1920x1080. It’s kind of astonishing to me how much can be crammed in to one little connector. That said, it’s frustrating trying to find a usb cable that works reliably, because as you’d imagine not all USB-C cables support the same specs.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If you buy a Steam Deck, or the Lenovo laptop I have for work, the only charging options you have are USB C. Their standard chargers put out at least 60 45 W, and they aren’t particularly special. In fact, I’m pretty sure 20 W at 5 V won’t be enough to supply these while in use, so you will either be using battery with long charge times in between, using them with battery-assisted power for longer use times until you hit those long charge times, or using the 60 45 W or more at whatever voltage the chargers provide.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          My laptop can do 240W over USB-C, I’m just waiting for a charger that can do it with a modular cable

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Going to take a wild guess and say the same reason you shouldn’t chain extension cords. USB can carry over 200w these days.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I think in this case there’s a lot more tiny conductors sharing what can add up to pretty high current loads on PD connections. Adding extra connectors adding resistance to low (5-20v) voltage high current connections is adding an extra failure point and increasing resistance on the whole cable run.

        Not inherently unsafe, but just not a good idea to promote because you know someone will try to run a 200w charging cable for 30m with like 5 connected cables.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would hope that a device capable of pulling 200w from USB would be intelligent enough to detect the excessive voltage drop and error out or reduce the current.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Extensions aren’t part of the official spec, so they aren’t actually certified as proper USB-C.

      Same risks as any other janky no-name gear you see online, even if it SAYS it’s rated for a specific throughput or power rating, that may not be the case.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is what AI says about this video:

      The video is about the dangers of using USB-C extension cords. The narrator explains that USB-C extension cords are not officially certified by the USB Implementers Forum, which means that they are not guaranteed to be safe or reliable. He also explains that USB-C extension cords can be dangerous because they can overload the power supply of the device that they are connected to. This can cause the device to overheat and even catch fire. The narrator recommends that people avoid using USB-C extension cords altogether. Here are some of the specific dangers of using USB-C extension cords:

      • They can overload the power supply of the device that they are connected to.
      • They can cause the device to overheat and even catch fire.
      • They can degrade the performance of the device.
      • They can be unreliable.

      The narrator also explains that some USB-C extension cords have a label that says “USB 2.0 low speed devices can only work with one side of the ultra high rate extension cables interface.” This means that the USB 2.0 connection is only available on one side of the cable. This can be a problem if you need to connect a USB 2.0 device to the cable.

      The narrator recommends that people avoid using USB-C extension cords altogether. If you must use one, he recommends that you use a high-quality cable from a reputable manufacturer. You should also make sure that the cable is rated for the power requirements of the device that you are connecting to it. Overall, this video is a helpful resource for anyone who is considering using a USB-C extension cord. It provides important information about the dangers of using these cables and how to avoid them.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As always AI doesn’t quite get it. One of the main points is that it could catch on fire and burn down your house. Plus you’ll run into other problems as well. You’re not supposed to buy extensions for USB. Buy a longer cable instead.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I need the super duper reliable video summary LLM I was promised. Or else!

          I even bought my pitchfork for it, see? ----₤ What? It was on sale.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Idk man. If you’re writing wrong stuff, people will call you out here on Lemmy. Doesn’t really matter who you are. And the issue was someone wanting that info as text.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Jokes on you buddy. Most people can’t afford houses these days.

          But yeah, if you don’t know what exactly what you’re doing, err on the side of caution

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I asked the AI if it was wrong or you were wrong. It said you were wrong.

            Who am I to believe?

          • Ahrotahntee@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m sick of stuff that should be ~2 paragraphs of text being a video. I do not want to watch a person or hear a narrator, I interpret written information much more effectively, and being text I can retain significant portions of the document as necessary.

            • Jaybob32@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              You know, you don’t have to watch it. You can find the information elsewhere in text format. But I guess we all need to conform to your preferences.

              • Ahrotahntee@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s nice that you’re so ready to delegate to my natural authority, but unnecessary.

      • Bezier@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The AI got most of it vaguely right, but unsurprisingly a lot seems to go above its head. Kinda like reading a shitty tech journalist writing about something they don’t understand at all.