• renzev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I hate how we allowed these ghouls to make the word “nonstick” synonymous with teflon/PFAS. It makes it sound like if you use a regular pan, you constantly have to scrape off burnt food or something. That’s just not true, a well-seasoned regular pan can be just as “nonstick” as one with a PFAS coating. It’s a fake non-problem that was invented to sell this garbage that poisons us and the environment. If it was up to me, the executives at dupont and anyone else responsible for this psyop would be sent off to labor camps (with humane working conditions of course)

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Issues with food sticking to either a stainless, carbon steel, or cast iron pan, largely come down to technique and maintenance.

      So if you’re going out to buy a teflon pan you’re admitting that either you’re a bad cook, or you’re lazy…. Or both.

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    What a ridiculous world we live in. The board members should be facing prison sentences, the company’s liquidated and the money back to the people.

    • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 days ago

      The money should be put into a cancer fund to pay for research and people’s medical bills from the cancer all this shit causes.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        Why’s that? I’ve never owned any of the 3, all pans have been some form of nonstick.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          64
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Carbon steel and cast iron cookware have reactive metal surfaces that will rust if left exposed to moisture and air, especially when heated. To use these materials of cookware you need to season them which involves washing the surface clean and applying a very thin layer of oil which you then heat up to a high temperature (usually past the smoke point, but not strictly necessary).

          The heating of oil in contact with the metal causes the oil molecules to polymerize and bond to the metal surface. Done properly, this gives your cast iron and carbon steel cookware a smooth, glassy, slightly brown protective polymer layer which prevents rust and helps foods release (though not as well as nonstick pans). The seasoning process can be repeated as many times as you like and it builds up more and more layers which darken over time. A well seasoned piece of cast iron or carbon steel cookware will look shiny and jet black, though this is not necessary for cooking.

          The downside of these materials is that acidic or basic foods can damage the polymer layer and dissolve it right off the pan with enough heat and cooking time. Tomato sauce is a classic example of an acidic food that will eat away at the seasoning of a cast iron or carbon steel pan. A well seasoned pan can still be used to cook a tomato sauce, but not one you plan to be simmering for hours and hours (like some Sunday meat sauce like you’d see in Goodfellas).

          Stainless steel (as well as enameled or porcelain coated) cookware is nonreactive so you can use it to cook acidic or basic foods no problem!

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 days ago

            Ohh right, I didn’t think about how acidic tomatoes are. I love tomatoes, but some of the people around me get absolutely horrible stomach pains apparently.

            Anyway, we make tomato based sauces at home, but never have we simmered anything for several hours like that cooking scene in Goodfellas. Should I? Would it be significantly better?

            • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It depends what you’re going for. There are a lot of classic long simmered tomato sauces, they are a different thing than fast cooked ones though. Long cooked ones tend to be more mellow and complex, but lose some of the acidic zing, adding a bit of vinegar or wine at the end can bring that back though.

              Just don’t make them in a cast iron, not only will the strip the seasoning, they will also absorb some iron, great if you have an iron deficiency, but it can make the sauce taste a bit metal-y.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Oh you’ve got no idea how good tomato sauce can get then! It’s also great for making huge batches so you freeze most of it for later.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I thought there, who on earth makes tomato sauce in a non-stick pan 😅

            Nice writeup btw!

            So my stainless steel/inox Lagostina pan is non reactive? What would be the benefit from having a carbon steel one (I have used cast iron a lot but it’s so heavy)?

            Any community you’d recommend?

            • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Carbon steel is lighter but this also has less thermal mass, so it heats up and cools down faster, also tends to have less even heating.

              So, searing something quickly on a preheated pan is a bit harder since the pan will cool off faster as the food leaches the heat out. Important for stuff like stir fry’s or steaks where you want short periods of intense heat for good searing at the surface but not over cooking in the interior.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Exactly that: weight. Some people will give you other reasons why they like carbon steel but the most important is that it works like cast iron only lighter

            • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              A well seasoned carbon steel is pretty much non-stick while in a stainless you usually want some sticking to have something to deglaze for sauces.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t want to cause a panic, but acids like tomato juice, ascorbic, citric and vinegar can attack stainless steel and dissolved chrome in the process.

            But don’t think of it as extra chrome in your diet. After all, we get iron rich water from our cast iron pipes and fittings. Nah, think of it as that extra cancer you’re gonna be getting! Iron never gave you cancer, that’s a lousy metal. But chrome is pretty good!

              • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 days ago

                Basically go to goodwill and have a look at their used stainless pans and then compare that to what you see at the store. Its not magic material. You put some tomatoes paste or salty beans or vinegar on it and you’ll be getting some chrome dissolved on to your food. Great! Its just a little right? Wrong! What else do you see? Scratches! Every time you use a metal spoon or steel wool to grab food or clean the pan, you create brand new unreacted leachable metal chrome…pans are probably grade 18 or 316 stainless steel, so 18% of whatever shavings you made becomes happy trivalent Cr-3 ions floating around with your tasty Na and CL lol. Look at pans that got overheated or pans where you accidentally left a spoon before going on vacation for a week…they’re black where some food was left on the surface due to oxygen depletion. Stainless steel is by no means the savior. Its the magic bullet, along with plastic in the food processing business! Processed foods pass thru churning mechanisms…metal rubbing and shedding stuff on to the food.

                This is why I sleep at night. I’m basically a walking FEMA disaster zone, yet, I still somehow get to my 8hr enslavement work and then back to my rest of the day 2-3 hours worth of family disfunctions just fine.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I just use a aluminum pan. It doesn’t really matter if it heats evenly since you are making a liquid.

            • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              If there is exposed aluminum, it will dissolve readily in to acidic food, polishing or not, and unlike dissolved iron which tastes off but might actually be good if you don’t get enough iron in your diet, aluminum has some toxicity to it, not a huge worry but something to be aware of.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Used cast iron is usually better than a lot of new stuff. Back in the day, it was common for the pitted surfaces to be ground smooth.

        Now you can only get that with some “premium brands” that are willing to take a grinder to a pan before throwing it in the box.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          SO THAT IS WHY MY FRYING PAN IS ANNOYING!

          I just thought it was going to be naturally ground down over time…

          Damn it, now I gotta find a thrift store.

          • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Or you can season the shit out of it. That will also smooth out the surface. Seasoning basically makes non-stick layers on your pan using burned oil.

            Preferably outdoors wipe a thin film of cooking oil on the pan and heat it up till it smokes, leaves smokey for a bit, cool down and repeat.

            It’d probably be smart to read real instructions somewhere else, but that’s the jist of it.

          • Jesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can still get vintage Wagner cast iron for a decent price on eBay or FB marketplace, but over the past 15 years people have started to catch on to what I just mentioned. So it’s not as dirt cheap as it once was.

            These days I generally know how to cook on a pitted lodge without it sticking, but smooth cast iron is more forgiving.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              The difference is what part is more forgiving

              • a smooth well seasoned surface is most forgiving for your food not sticking
              • a rough sandcast surface is most forgiving of poor cleaning habits. The seasoning is usually good enough and it is more likely to remain adhered
        • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Got a few inherited from my grand and great grand parents, they’re amazing and perfect. Even got a cast iron muffin tin which is great for making Yorkshire puddings.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I have my browser configured to default to reader mode, and it seems readable

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Safeguarding Your Website 🕵️

                We’re checking if you’re a real person and not an automated bad bot. Usually, the captcha below will complete itself. If it doesn’t, simply click the checkbox in the captcha to verify. Once verified, you’ll be taken to the page you wanted to visit. Human verification is in progress ✨ Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue

                If for some reason after verifying the captcha above, you are constantly being redirected to this exact same page to re-verify the captcha again, then please click on the button below to get in touch with the support team.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I guess they don’t want our traffic then.

                  It’s unfortunate - I thought it was a fairly comprehensive and readable overview of the differences between enamel and ceramic coated

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      A bit ironic that a group labeling themselves the “Cookware Sustainability Alliance” is fighting to continue making unsustainable cookware.

      Both the fact that they have a voice that influences politicians more than their actual voters and that they’re allowed to call themselves that name is really a perfect representation of society.

  • Steak@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just use cast iron and stainless steel. I don’t own anything else.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Capitalists furious at suggestion they value human life over money

    ftfy

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    How about the suggestions that they are selling a product that should last for several lifetimes but instead lasts for 5 years if you treat it very well?

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      I moved to using cast iron and steel pans, I found even hand washing non-stick pans they eventually just get scuffed up after years.

      I’d rather just use a few more drops of oil on a regular pan.

      • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve got a few dishes that want a non stick surface and have a dinner in a tomato sauce. I keep the non stick for those, and for house guests who don’t understand carbon steel.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t. The flat iron skillet (comal) is nonstick enough at this point that even my kids never complain about making eggs on it, they release well. Tomato sauce does fine in stainless steel. Though I also haven’t made guests cook for themselves yet. Had one nonstick pan in the early 1990s and that was enough to sour me on them.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I also keep a couple non-stick skillets around for guests.

          However it’s incredible (in a bad way) just how ubiquitous these coatings have become. It’s going to take years to get through them all. I just got stainless cookie sheets but all my bakeware is non-stick (blind spot: I used to use a baking sheet for the broiler without connecting the dots on excessive heat vs teflon).

          Next step (by frequency of use) really needs to be my rice cooker

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            I highly recommend picking up a Japanese induction rice cooker. We’ve had a Zojirushi for a year and even at altitude it makes perfect rice every time.

            • Squiddlioni@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I nixed the Zojirushi because of the PTFE coating, but I love having a non-stick rice cooker. Ended up getting a GreenPan induction rice cooker with an insert that has a ceramic coating to make it nonstick, and I love it.

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I use our instant pot pressure cooker to make rice, and it’s stainless inside.

              I’m not suggesting it matches an actual Japanese rice cooker, but I think the results are pretty good.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              That brand does have an outstanding reputation and I have considered splurging on it, however I only see non-stick pans. Whereas I can get a cheap Aroma or similar with a stainless pan.

              I guess we’ll have to see how tedious it is to clean rice from stainless, but the goal is to reduce ptfe from my diet

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I make tomato sauces on both my cast iron and carbon steel. Sure, they get a bit bad afterwards, but oil+heat fixes that.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Personally I don’t give a damn about a pan whose entire life is spent slowly scraping away the carciogen on it and ingesting it with every meal you make. I am however not going to be scammed by the teflon pan manufacturers into buying a new overpriced pan every few years. Every other non non-stick pan outlasts multible generations of humans. A non stick in a professional kitchen won’t even make it to 1 year old.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If we didn’t live in capitalist plutocracies masquerading as “democracy”, every non-stick pan ever sold would be blatant false advertising and they wouldn’t be profitable to sell anymore.

      Lifetime guarantee my ass. None last more than a couple years of daily use regardless of how meticulously they’re cared for.

  • frankpsy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    All real nonstick cookware is Teflon or chemically related to it. I almost always use cast iron or carbon steel but they are not nonstick, you have to control heat and acidity for them to release well. You can even see in nonstick pans that liquids will tend to bead up and not spread out because of the surface, versus in any other pan you’ll only see water bead up when you hit certain temps. I can only achieve something like a French omelette in a nonstick pan, carbon steel has always been a disaster, because of that me and a lot of other people keep a nonstick around just for certain egg and crepe recipes.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      you’ll only see water bead up when you hit certain temps.

      Leidenfrost effect FTW

      Basically If you FIRST heat up your stainless steel cookware to the point that when you drip some water on it, it “beads up” instead of immediately boiling away, your cookware becomes temporarily non-stick. Just don’t want to go a lot hotter than that, or you’ll do things like burn butter (unless using Ghee butter or something with a higher “smoke point”)

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is it really that bad? Sure it might be linked to cancer but so are lots of other things.

    I personally just use normal cookware plus some vision stuff. All you need to do is salute some onions ahead of adding other things. The juice from the onions acts as a natural non stick.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      In reality no one can say for certain, but a lot of research is pointing to long term exposure being bad. The problem is that the research to determine how bad will take decades (and has been going on for decades at this point). Right now it’s being used as the boogeyman for every sort of ill from causing cancer, infertility, issues with lactation, liver failure, high cholesterol, thyroid disease, and auto-immune disorders. Basically the preliminary research says that it at least in part impacts all of these things, we just don’t know how much.

      On the flip side bacon also causes cancer and high cholesterol at some level. That’s not to make light of the situation, but it does give some credence to your earlier statement.

      The thing people are missing in these discussions is what are they willing to live without if we don’t use these chemicals. Going without non-stick cookware is literally the tip of the iceberg. How do we feel about cars, furniture, and mattresses being more flammable because they don’t have the fire retarding forever chemicals? How do we feel about stain resistance, oil resistance, water resistance, and slip resistance in everything including shoes, umbrellas, clothes, oven mitts, jackets, and more? How do we feel about needing to clean everything including clothes, appliances, and floors more often. How about in industry where it’s used as a fume suppressant so smelly chemicals don’t waft as far or fire fighting foams the next time an electric car catches on fire? This stuff is even in the wrapping of your food so the it doesn’t go through the packaging and cause a mess as easily.

      Dupont coined the phrase “Better Living Through Chemistry” and that chemistry is PFAS. It’s in your clothes when you buy them, it’s in your detergent when you clean them, it’s in the cleaner that you wipe your washer off with, it’s in the floor sealant of the laundry room that washer is in, it’s in the gloves you wear while cleaning that laundry room, it’s in the carpet in the room next to the laundry room, and the list goes on and on.

      Dropping PFAS chemicals fully would probably send us back to the 1960’s or we’ll end up replacing it with something just as bad that we don’t know the effects of yet.

      • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not just the use itself, but also how irresponsibly it is produced. Exposing pregnant workers to high levels, dumping it in community water supplies, on farmland etc.

        Also the EU did ban them last september (effective in 2026) for essentially all of the uses you outlined, most of which I dont think are such a big deal and just minor inconveniences. It’s not like the 60s were terrible in terms of living conditions.

        We also used to use asbestos for a lot of the uses you outlined and we got rid of that without too much inconvenience, but you could have made similar arguments about it back then.

        And any reduction is a good thing, it’s not an all or nothing thing. DDT was banned, but can and is still used where there’s no better alternative. And just categorically saying any alternative must be just as bad is just a non-sequitur, there’s no reason that should be true. Cookware is a good example, cast iron works just as well, is not as bad, the only downside compared to teflon is weight. But it’s not like sending us back to the stone age or anything…

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          And just categorically saying any alternative must be just as bad is just a non-sequitur, there’s no reason that should be true. Cookware is a good example, cast iron works just as well, is not as bad, the only downside compared to teflon is weight. But it’s not like sending us back to the stone age or anything…

          You can have your own opinion here, but anything which performs like PFAS compounds, in the variety of uses that PFAS is used, will almost certainly be bad. In general when you make new compounds and materials which are more complex their potential health impacts are worse. PFAS is already an extremely complex material and while broad sweeping statements might not be 100% accurate, I wouldn’t bet that it’s replacement would be better for people.

          It’s another thing altogether if you are recommending going backward in the development chain, cookware is a good example here but it’s limited case underlies the ubiquity of PFAS. Hell, PFAS is a major component in computer part manufacturing and is part of the reason computing technology has progressed as it has.

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t have a lot of thoughts on the matter, I know a good bit about PFAS, not microplastics. Grams vs Nanograms is a huge difference, but I don’t know if that’s detrimental or not. Looking over the link you provided the study provides it’s own description of limitations which may or may not be trivial.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s in the rain and every freshwater fish or lake water has it, such that even once per year fish consumption is not recommended. Safe level is 4.4ng per kg body weight/week. 300ng for adult male. Half kilo of fish will be 4800ng. Technically that is 3 fish portions per year, but you will get enough smaller amounts every day to breech limit with freshwater fish.

        You have a point that it may still be needed for some stuff.

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          You can’t have it needed in some stuff and critically dangerous if it’s a bio-accumulating chemical that virtually never breaks down. To reduce it enough to not be a hazard world wide you would functionally have to stop using it everywhere.

          I haven’t seen any definitive results on dangerous health levels, 4.4 ng/kg might be it, but then other studies show people with mg/L of blood concentration. Overall the effects of exposure seem to depend on more than just the concentration, such as health status, exposure duration, magnitude of exposure, and how lucky you got with the genetic lottery. Even then we are fairly certain it is bad, we just don’t know what or how specifically. I would also throw caution at any study using ng as a serious measurement here, especially over prolonged exposure. The problem with measuring on such a low level is that you have far too much uncertainty to claim any true accuracy, at best these studies are guessing when they throw out numbers. Hell, the EPA just came out with a standardized method for analyzing PFAS last year.

          At those levels of exposure you’re probably getting it just from eating commercially grown fruits and vegetables, because it can bio-accumulate in those as well.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            other studies show people with mg/L of blood concentration

            4.4ng/kg per week was the result from google “safe pfas levels”. 46 weeks gets to 1 mg.

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Can’t even use a Teflon pan if you have a budgie or the fumes will kill it.

      So I think it is probably quite bad.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s perfectly fine so long as none of the coating gets in your body, but given you’re making food with it, there’s a high chance it will.

      If it get’s too hot it will off gas, if it gets scratched with something harder than it (like a metal spatula, or salt grains) it will flake off. So you should use plastic or wood utensils when cooking in one, and the black plastic utensils have their own issues with often being made from recycled plastics that have fire retardants mixed in, which can leach out.

      You can be safe with them but it requires you be careful and deliberate with use. Personally, I think it’s easier just to use something else, even if that means taking the time to learn about how to use them well.

    • gens@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      This article is horrible. Anyway…

      Teflon has a melting point of 327°C, that can happen on a stove.

      IMO It’s fine, just don’t burn your pan. Not sure about scratching it, but don’t do that either.

      • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m not sure you need to melt it for the PFAS to leech out. There was a study recently about smart watch bands and they found that the PFAS exposure from wearing them was way above safe limits and they weren’t being heated to 327C.

        Admittedly frypan coatings and watch bands are not the same materials, but still…

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        So, just don’t do the two things that happen to every non-stick pan ever. Gotcha.

      • snowe@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        using a pan means you have to construct that pan, in a factory that pollutes massive amount of PFAS directly into the soil and water table.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Never really had any issue with Teflon (and Teflon substitute) pans, but I’ve been impressed with the non-stickiness of my dirt cheap “ceramic” wok.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The issue is that we don’t have much research on the ceramic coatings ether. They might be fine, but, there hasn’t really been enough testing to know. We might just be walking in to the same problem all over again, fluorocarbon coatings seemed fine at fist to, then they turned out to be a huge problem.

  • flango@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    These non-stick pans are usually cheaper then stainless steel and cast iron, so people with lower income are more prone to buy it. Consequently, considering that low education is associated with poverty, poor people are buying more of this type of pans and not using it “properly” so getting exposed to possibly more harm and not knowing about it.

    Also, " just discard the pan if flocking occurs", is everything that this industry wants: you’ll continue in an indefinitely loop of trowing away pans and buying new ones for the maximization of their profits. Thus is expected that flocking will occur more soon than ever.